<p>Let <i>F</i> be a non-Archimedean local field. For any irreducible smooth representation <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\pi \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>π</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> of <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textrm{GL}_n(F)\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mtext>GL</mtext> <mi>n</mi> </msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>F</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and a multisegment <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\mathfrak {m}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="fraktur">m</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, we have an operation <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(D_{{\mathfrak {m}}}(\pi )\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mi>D</mi> <mi mathvariant="fraktur">m</mi> </msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>π</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> to construct a simple quotient <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\tau \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>τ</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> of a Bernstein-Zelevinsky derivative of <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\pi \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>π</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. This article continues the previous one to study the following poset <Equation ID="Equ5"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\begin{aligned} {\mathcal {S}}(\pi , \tau ) {:}{=}\left\{ {\mathfrak {n}} : D_{{\mathfrak {n}}}(\pi )\cong \tau \right\} , \end{aligned}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math display="block"> <mrow> <mtable> <mtr> <mtd columnalign="right"> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="script">S</mi> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>π</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>τ</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mo>:</mo> <mo>=</mo> <mfenced close="}" open="{"> <mi mathvariant="fraktur">n</mi> <mo>:</mo> <msub> <mi>D</mi> <mi mathvariant="fraktur">n</mi> </msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>π</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mo>≅</mo> <mi>τ</mi> </mfenced> <mo>,</mo> </mrow> </mtd> </mtr> </mtable> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </Equation>where <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\mathfrak {n}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="fraktur">n</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> runs for all the multisegments. Here the partial ordering on <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\mathcal {S}}(\pi , \tau )\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="script">S</mi> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>π</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>τ</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> comes from the Zelevinsky ordering. We show that the poset has a unique minimal multisegment. Along the way, we introduce two new ingredients: fine chain orderings and local minimizability.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Construction of simple quotients of Bernstein-Zelevinsky derivatives and highest derivative multisegments II: minimal sequences

  • Kei Yuen Chan

摘要

Let F be a non-Archimedean local field. For any irreducible smooth representation \(\pi \) π of \(\textrm{GL}_n(F)\) GL n ( F ) and a multisegment \({\mathfrak {m}}\) m , we have an operation \(D_{{\mathfrak {m}}}(\pi )\) D m ( π ) to construct a simple quotient \(\tau \) τ of a Bernstein-Zelevinsky derivative of \(\pi \) π . This article continues the previous one to study the following poset \(\begin{aligned} {\mathcal {S}}(\pi , \tau ) {:}{=}\left\{ {\mathfrak {n}} : D_{{\mathfrak {n}}}(\pi )\cong \tau \right\} , \end{aligned}\) S ( π , τ ) : = n : D n ( π ) τ , where \({\mathfrak {n}}\) n runs for all the multisegments. Here the partial ordering on \({\mathcal {S}}(\pi , \tau )\) S ( π , τ ) comes from the Zelevinsky ordering. We show that the poset has a unique minimal multisegment. Along the way, we introduce two new ingredients: fine chain orderings and local minimizability.