Purpose <p>The relevance of CYP2D6 activity on serum levels and clinical response of fluoxetine remains unclear. The present study aim was to evaluate the impact of <i>CYP2D6</i> genotype on i) fluoxetine and norfluoxetine exposure, and ii) treatment switch from fluoxetine to alternative antidepressants in adults and children/adolescents.</p> Methods <p>Patients were included retrospectively from a therapeutic drug monitoring service. Patients were subgrouped by age, i.e. &lt; 18 yrs (young) and ≥ 18 yrs (adult), and divided into CYP2D6 genotype-predicted phenotype subgroups of poor metabolizers (PMs), intermediate metabolizers (IMs), normal metabolizers (NMs) and ultrarapid metabolizers (UMs).</p> Results <p>Among 1027 adult patients, the metabolic ratio was lowest in PMs and highest in UMs (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.04), but there was no difference in active moiety (fluoxetine + norfluoxetine) across CYP2D6 phenotype groups (<i>p</i> ≥ 0.1). Similar trends were observed in 196 young patients, both for metabolic ratio and active moiety. In adult patients, switching from fluoxetine to an alternative antidepressant had odds ratio of 2.9 in UMs (<i>p</i> = 0.004) and 2.3 in PMs (<i>p</i> = 0.007) compared with NMs. The number of switches per genotype group was too low for meaningful comparisons in young patients.</p> Conclusion <p>The fluoxetine and norfluoxetine active moiety was unaffected by <i>CYP2D6</i> genotype in adults and children/adolescents. Still, adult CYP2D6 PMs and UMs switched antidepressant treatment two to three times more often than NMs, indicating that relative levels of fluoxetine and norfluoxetine may affect treatment outcome rather than active moiety in relation to CYP2D6 phenotype.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Impact of CYP2D6 genotype on fluoxetine exposure and treatment switch in adults and children/adolescents

  • Karoline Linnea Nordby,
  • Pari Faraj,
  • Espen Molden,
  • Kristine Hole

摘要

Purpose

The relevance of CYP2D6 activity on serum levels and clinical response of fluoxetine remains unclear. The present study aim was to evaluate the impact of CYP2D6 genotype on i) fluoxetine and norfluoxetine exposure, and ii) treatment switch from fluoxetine to alternative antidepressants in adults and children/adolescents.

Methods

Patients were included retrospectively from a therapeutic drug monitoring service. Patients were subgrouped by age, i.e. < 18 yrs (young) and ≥ 18 yrs (adult), and divided into CYP2D6 genotype-predicted phenotype subgroups of poor metabolizers (PMs), intermediate metabolizers (IMs), normal metabolizers (NMs) and ultrarapid metabolizers (UMs).

Results

Among 1027 adult patients, the metabolic ratio was lowest in PMs and highest in UMs (p ≤ 0.04), but there was no difference in active moiety (fluoxetine + norfluoxetine) across CYP2D6 phenotype groups (p ≥ 0.1). Similar trends were observed in 196 young patients, both for metabolic ratio and active moiety. In adult patients, switching from fluoxetine to an alternative antidepressant had odds ratio of 2.9 in UMs (p = 0.004) and 2.3 in PMs (p = 0.007) compared with NMs. The number of switches per genotype group was too low for meaningful comparisons in young patients.

Conclusion

The fluoxetine and norfluoxetine active moiety was unaffected by CYP2D6 genotype in adults and children/adolescents. Still, adult CYP2D6 PMs and UMs switched antidepressant treatment two to three times more often than NMs, indicating that relative levels of fluoxetine and norfluoxetine may affect treatment outcome rather than active moiety in relation to CYP2D6 phenotype.