<p>We define rewinding operators that invert quantum measurements. Then, we define complexity classes <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="224_2024_10208_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="56" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textsf{RwBQP}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="sans-serif">RwBQP</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="224_2024_10208_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="45" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textsf{CBQP}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="sans-serif">CBQP</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, and <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="224_2024_10208_Article_IEq3.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="83" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textsf{AdPostBQP}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="sans-serif">AdPostBQP</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> as sets of decision problems solvable by polynomial-size quantum circuits with a polynomial number of rewinding operators, cloning operators, and adaptive postselections, respectively. Our main result is that <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="224_2024_10208_Article_IEq4.gif" Format="GIF" Height="20" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="376" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textsf{BPP}^\textsf{PP}\subseteq \textsf{RwBQP}=\textsf{CBQP}=\textsf{AdPostBQP}\subseteq \textsf{PSPACE}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msup> <mi mathvariant="sans-serif">BPP</mi> <mi mathvariant="sans-serif">PP</mi> </msup> <mo>⊆</mo> <mi mathvariant="sans-serif">RwBQP</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mi mathvariant="sans-serif">CBQP</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mi mathvariant="sans-serif">AdPostBQP</mi> <mo>⊆</mo> <mi mathvariant="sans-serif">PSPACE</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. As a byproduct of this result, we show that any problem in <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="224_2024_10208_Article_IEq5.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="65" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textsf{PostBQP}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="sans-serif">PostBQP</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> can be solved with only postselections of events that occur with probabilities polynomially close to one. Under the strongly believed assumption that <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="224_2024_10208_Article_IEq6.gif" Format="GIF" Height="21" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="88" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textsf{BQP}\nsupseteq \textsf{SZK}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="sans-serif">BQP</mi> <mo>⊉</mo> <mi mathvariant="sans-serif">SZK</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, or the shortest independent vectors problem cannot be efficiently solved with quantum computers, we also show that a single rewinding operator is sufficient to achieve tasks that are intractable for quantum computation. Finally, we show that rewindable Clifford circuits remain classically simulatable, but rewindable instantaneous quantum polynomial time circuits can solve any problem in <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="224_2024_10208_Article_IEq7.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="22" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textsf{PP}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="sans-serif">PP</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Rewindable Quantum Computation and Its Equivalence to Cloning and Adaptive Postselection

  • Ryo Hiromasa,
  • Akihiro Mizutani,
  • Yuki Takeuchi,
  • Seiichiro Tani

摘要

We define rewinding operators that invert quantum measurements. Then, we define complexity classes \(\textsf{RwBQP}\) RwBQP , \(\textsf{CBQP}\) CBQP , and \(\textsf{AdPostBQP}\) AdPostBQP as sets of decision problems solvable by polynomial-size quantum circuits with a polynomial number of rewinding operators, cloning operators, and adaptive postselections, respectively. Our main result is that \(\textsf{BPP}^\textsf{PP}\subseteq \textsf{RwBQP}=\textsf{CBQP}=\textsf{AdPostBQP}\subseteq \textsf{PSPACE}\) BPP PP RwBQP = CBQP = AdPostBQP PSPACE . As a byproduct of this result, we show that any problem in \(\textsf{PostBQP}\) PostBQP can be solved with only postselections of events that occur with probabilities polynomially close to one. Under the strongly believed assumption that \(\textsf{BQP}\nsupseteq \textsf{SZK}\) BQP SZK , or the shortest independent vectors problem cannot be efficiently solved with quantum computers, we also show that a single rewinding operator is sufficient to achieve tasks that are intractable for quantum computation. Finally, we show that rewindable Clifford circuits remain classically simulatable, but rewindable instantaneous quantum polynomial time circuits can solve any problem in \(\textsf{PP}\) PP .