<p>We generalize theorems of Bondal and Van den Bergh and of Rouquier. A corollary of our main results says the following. Let <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>X</mi> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$X$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> be a scheme proper over a an excellent, finite-dimensional noetherian ring <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>R</mi> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$R$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. Then the Yoneda pairing, taking an object <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>A</mi> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$A$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> in the category <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msup> <mi mathvariant="bold">D</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">perf</mi> </msup> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>X</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">${\mathbf {D}}^{\mathrm {perf}}(X)$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and an object <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>B</mi> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$B$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> in the category <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msubsup> <mi mathvariant="bold">D</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">coh</mi> <mi>b</mi> </msubsup> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>X</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$\mathbf {D}^{b}_{\mathrm {coh}}(X)$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, to the finite <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>R</mi> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$R$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>–module <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mo mathvariant="normal">Hom</mo> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>A</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>B</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$\mathop {\mathrm {Hom}}(A,B)$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, gives an equivalence of <InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msubsup> <mi mathvariant="bold">D</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">coh</mi> <mi>b</mi> </msubsup> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>X</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$\mathbf {D}^{b}_{\mathrm {coh}}(X)$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> with the category of finite <InlineEquation ID="IEq10"> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>R</mi> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$R$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>–linear homological functors <InlineEquation ID="IEq11"> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>H</mi> <mo>:</mo> <msup> <mi mathvariant="bold">D</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">perf</mi> </msup> <msup> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>X</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">op</mi> </msup> <mo>⟶</mo> <mrow> <mi>R</mi> <mtext>–mod</mtext> </mrow> <mspace width="0.25em" /> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$H:{\mathbf {D}}^{\mathrm {perf}}(X)^{\mathrm {op}}\longrightarrow \mathop {R\textup {--mod}} \ $</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, and an equivalence of <InlineEquation ID="IEq12"> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msup> <mi mathvariant="bold">D</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">perf</mi> </msup> <msup> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>X</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">op</mi> </msup> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">${\mathbf {D}}^{\mathrm {perf}}(X)^{\mathrm {op}}$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> with the category of finite homological functors <InlineEquation ID="IEq13"> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>H</mi> <mo>:</mo> <msubsup> <mi mathvariant="bold">D</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">coh</mi> <mi>b</mi> </msubsup> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>X</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> <mo>⟶</mo> <mrow> <mi>R</mi> <mtext>–mod</mtext> </mrow> <mspace width="0.25em" /> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$H:\mathbf {D}^{b}_{\mathrm {coh}}(X)\longrightarrow \mathop {R\textup {--mod}} \ $</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. Recall: a homological functor <InlineEquation ID="IEq14"> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>H</mi> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$H$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> is <i>finite</i> if <InlineEquation ID="IEq15"> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mo>⊕</mo> <mmultiscripts> <mi>H</mi> <none /> <mi>i</mi> <mprescripts /> <mrow> <mi>i</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mo>−</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mi> </mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mi> </mmultiscripts> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>C</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$\oplus _{i=-\infty }^{\infty }H^{i}(C)$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> is a finite <InlineEquation ID="IEq16"> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>R</mi> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$R$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>–module for every <InlineEquation ID="IEq17"> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>C</mi> <mo>∈</mo> <msup> <mi mathvariant="bold">D</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">perf</mi> </msup> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>X</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$C\in {\mathbf {D}}^{\mathrm {perf}}(X)$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. Bondal and Van den Bergh proved the special case, of the assertion about <InlineEquation ID="IEq18"> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msubsup> <mi mathvariant="bold">D</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">coh</mi> <mi>b</mi> </msubsup> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>X</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$\mathbf {D}^{b}_{\mathrm {coh}}(X)$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> identifying with the finite homological functors on <InlineEquation ID="IEq19"> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msup> <mi mathvariant="bold">D</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">perf</mi> </msup> <msup> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>X</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">op</mi> </msup> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">${\mathbf {D}}^{\mathrm {perf}}(X)^{\mathrm {op}}$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, as long as <InlineEquation ID="IEq20"> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>R</mi> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$R$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> is a field and <InlineEquation ID="IEq21"> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>X</mi> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$X$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> is projective over <InlineEquation ID="IEq22"> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>R</mi> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$R$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. And the assertion about <InlineEquation ID="IEq23"> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msup> <mi mathvariant="bold">D</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">perf</mi> </msup> <msup> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>X</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">op</mi> </msup> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">${\mathbf {D}}^{\mathrm {perf}}(X)^{\mathrm {op}}$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, identifying with the finite homological functors on <InlineEquation ID="IEq24"> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msubsup> <mi mathvariant="bold">D</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">coh</mi> <mi>b</mi> </msubsup> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>X</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$\mathbf {D}^{b}_{\mathrm {coh}}(X)$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, again under the assumption that <InlineEquation ID="IEq25"> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>X</mi> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$X$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> is projective over a field <InlineEquation ID="IEq26"> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>R</mi> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$R$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, is due to Rouquier. But our theorems are far more general yet. They aren’t only about schemes, they work in the abstract generality of triangulated categories with coproducts and a single compact generator, satisfying a certain approximability property. At the moment I only know how to prove this approximability for the categories <InlineEquation ID="IEq27"> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi mathvariant="bold">D</mi> <mtext mathvariant="bold">qc</mtext> </msub> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>X</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">${\mathbf{D}_{\text{\textbf{qc}}}}(X)$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> with <InlineEquation ID="IEq28"> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>X</mi> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$X$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> a quasicompact, separated scheme, for the homotopy category of spectra, for the category <InlineEquation ID="IEq29"> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="bold">D</mi> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>R</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">${\mathbf{D}}(R)$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> where <InlineEquation ID="IEq30"> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>R</mi> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$R$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> is a (possibly noncommutative) negatively graded dg algebra, and for certain recollements of the above. The work was inspired by Jack Hall’s elegant new proof of a vast generalization of GAGA, a proof based on representability theorems of the type above. The generality of Hall’s result made me wonder how far the known representability theorems could be improved.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Triangulated categories with a single compact generator, and two Brown representability theorems

  • Amnon Neeman

摘要

We generalize theorems of Bondal and Van den Bergh and of Rouquier. A corollary of our main results says the following. Let X $X$ be a scheme proper over a an excellent, finite-dimensional noetherian ring R $R$ . Then the Yoneda pairing, taking an object A $A$ in the category D perf ( X ) ${\mathbf {D}}^{\mathrm {perf}}(X)$ and an object B $B$ in the category D coh b ( X ) $\mathbf {D}^{b}_{\mathrm {coh}}(X)$ , to the finite R $R$ –module Hom ( A , B ) $\mathop {\mathrm {Hom}}(A,B)$ , gives an equivalence of D coh b ( X ) $\mathbf {D}^{b}_{\mathrm {coh}}(X)$ with the category of finite R $R$ –linear homological functors H : D perf ( X ) op R –mod $H:{\mathbf {D}}^{\mathrm {perf}}(X)^{\mathrm {op}}\longrightarrow \mathop {R\textup {--mod}} \ $ , and an equivalence of D perf ( X ) op ${\mathbf {D}}^{\mathrm {perf}}(X)^{\mathrm {op}}$ with the category of finite homological functors H : D coh b ( X ) R –mod $H:\mathbf {D}^{b}_{\mathrm {coh}}(X)\longrightarrow \mathop {R\textup {--mod}} \ $ . Recall: a homological functor H $H$ is finite if H i i = ( C ) $\oplus _{i=-\infty }^{\infty }H^{i}(C)$ is a finite R $R$ –module for every C D perf ( X ) $C\in {\mathbf {D}}^{\mathrm {perf}}(X)$ . Bondal and Van den Bergh proved the special case, of the assertion about D coh b ( X ) $\mathbf {D}^{b}_{\mathrm {coh}}(X)$ identifying with the finite homological functors on D perf ( X ) op ${\mathbf {D}}^{\mathrm {perf}}(X)^{\mathrm {op}}$ , as long as R $R$ is a field and X $X$ is projective over R $R$ . And the assertion about D perf ( X ) op ${\mathbf {D}}^{\mathrm {perf}}(X)^{\mathrm {op}}$ , identifying with the finite homological functors on D coh b ( X ) $\mathbf {D}^{b}_{\mathrm {coh}}(X)$ , again under the assumption that X $X$ is projective over a field R $R$ , is due to Rouquier. But our theorems are far more general yet. They aren’t only about schemes, they work in the abstract generality of triangulated categories with coproducts and a single compact generator, satisfying a certain approximability property. At the moment I only know how to prove this approximability for the categories D qc ( X ) ${\mathbf{D}_{\text{\textbf{qc}}}}(X)$ with X $X$ a quasicompact, separated scheme, for the homotopy category of spectra, for the category D ( R ) ${\mathbf{D}}(R)$ where R $R$ is a (possibly noncommutative) negatively graded dg algebra, and for certain recollements of the above. The work was inspired by Jack Hall’s elegant new proof of a vast generalization of GAGA, a proof based on representability theorems of the type above. The generality of Hall’s result made me wonder how far the known representability theorems could be improved.