<p>We thank Dr.&#xa0;Piscitelli for his thoughtful letter&#xa0;(Piscitelli in Exp Brain Res, 2026) and the opportunity for scholarly dialogue on fundamental questions in motor control. His commentary raises important epistemological considerations regarding theory displacement and the evidential status of referent control theory. We address these points systematically, clarifying both the standards we applied and the empirical foundations of our critique.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Response to “Comments on ‘The equilibrium point hypothesis revisited: why threshold control does not explain human movement”’

  • Madhur Mangalam,
  • Nick Stergiou

摘要

We thank Dr. Piscitelli for his thoughtful letter (Piscitelli in Exp Brain Res, 2026) and the opportunity for scholarly dialogue on fundamental questions in motor control. His commentary raises important epistemological considerations regarding theory displacement and the evidential status of referent control theory. We address these points systematically, clarifying both the standards we applied and the empirical foundations of our critique.