<p>The real Fourier–Mukai (RFM) transform relates calibrated graphs to so-called “deformed instantons” on Hermitian line bundles. We show that under the RFM transform, complex Lagrangian graphs in <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="220_2025_5389_Article_IEq4.gif" Format="GIF" Height="17" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="73" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathbb {R}^{2n} \times T^{2n}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>2</mn> <mi>n</mi> </mrow> </msup> <mo>×</mo> <msup> <mi>T</mi> <mrow> <mn>2</mn> <mi>n</mi> </mrow> </msup> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> correspond to <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="220_2025_5389_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="42" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textrm{Sp}(n)\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mtext>Sp</mtext> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>n</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>-instantons over <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="220_2025_5389_Article_IEq6.gif" Format="GIF" Height="20" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="92" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathbb {R}^{2n} \times (T^{2n})^*\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>2</mn> <mi>n</mi> </mrow> </msup> <mo>×</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <msup> <mi>T</mi> <mrow> <mn>2</mn> <mi>n</mi> </mrow> </msup> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mo>∗</mo> </msup> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. In other words, the deformed <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="220_2025_5389_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="42" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textrm{Sp}(n)\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mtext>Sp</mtext> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>n</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>-instanton equation coincides with the usual <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="220_2025_5389_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="42" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textrm{Sp}(n)\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mtext>Sp</mtext> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>n</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>-instanton equation. Motivated by this observation, we study <InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="220_2025_5389_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="42" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textrm{Sp}(n)\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mtext>Sp</mtext> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>n</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>-instantons on hyperkähler manifolds <InlineEquation ID="IEq10"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="220_2025_5389_Article_IEq10.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="31" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(X^{4n}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msup> <mi>X</mi> <mrow> <mn>4</mn> <mi>n</mi> </mrow> </msup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, with an emphasis on conical singularities. First, when <InlineEquation ID="IEq11"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="220_2025_5389_Article_IEq11.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="83" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(X = C(M)\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>X</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mi>C</mi> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>M</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> is a hyperkähler cone, we relate <InlineEquation ID="IEq12"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="220_2025_5389_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="42" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textrm{Sp}(n)\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mtext>Sp</mtext> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>n</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>-instantons on <i>X</i> to tri-contact instantons on the 3-Sasakian link <i>M</i> and consider various dimensional reductions. Second, when <i>X</i> is an asymptotically conical (AC) hyperkähler manifold of rate <InlineEquation ID="IEq13"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="220_2025_5389_Article_IEq13.gif" Format="GIF" Height="22" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="114" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\nu \le -\frac{2}{3}(2n+1)\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>ν</mi> <mo>≤</mo> <mo>-</mo> <mfrac> <mn>2</mn> <mn>3</mn> </mfrac> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mn>2</mn> <mi>n</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>1</mn> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, we prove a Lewis-type theorem to the following effect: If the set of AC <InlineEquation ID="IEq14"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="220_2025_5389_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="42" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textrm{Sp}(n)\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mtext>Sp</mtext> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>n</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>-instantons is non-empty, then every AC Hermitian Yang–Mills connection over <i>X</i> with sufficiently fast decay at infinity is an <InlineEquation ID="IEq15"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="220_2025_5389_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="42" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textrm{Sp}(n)\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mtext>Sp</mtext> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>n</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>-instanton.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

On \(\textrm{Sp}(n)\)-Instantons and the Fourier–Mukai Transform of Complex Lagrangians

  • Jesse Madnick,
  • Emily Autumn Windes

摘要

The real Fourier–Mukai (RFM) transform relates calibrated graphs to so-called “deformed instantons” on Hermitian line bundles. We show that under the RFM transform, complex Lagrangian graphs in \(\mathbb {R}^{2n} \times T^{2n}\) R 2 n × T 2 n correspond to \(\textrm{Sp}(n)\) Sp ( n ) -instantons over \(\mathbb {R}^{2n} \times (T^{2n})^*\) R 2 n × ( T 2 n ) . In other words, the deformed \(\textrm{Sp}(n)\) Sp ( n ) -instanton equation coincides with the usual \(\textrm{Sp}(n)\) Sp ( n ) -instanton equation. Motivated by this observation, we study \(\textrm{Sp}(n)\) Sp ( n ) -instantons on hyperkähler manifolds \(X^{4n}\) X 4 n , with an emphasis on conical singularities. First, when \(X = C(M)\) X = C ( M ) is a hyperkähler cone, we relate \(\textrm{Sp}(n)\) Sp ( n ) -instantons on X to tri-contact instantons on the 3-Sasakian link M and consider various dimensional reductions. Second, when X is an asymptotically conical (AC) hyperkähler manifold of rate \(\nu \le -\frac{2}{3}(2n+1)\) ν - 2 3 ( 2 n + 1 ) , we prove a Lewis-type theorem to the following effect: If the set of AC \(\textrm{Sp}(n)\) Sp ( n ) -instantons is non-empty, then every AC Hermitian Yang–Mills connection over X with sufficiently fast decay at infinity is an \(\textrm{Sp}(n)\) Sp ( n ) -instanton.