<p>Our motivation in this paper is twofold. First, we study the geometry of a class of exploration sets, called <i>exit sets</i>, which are naturally associated with a 2D vector-valued Gaussian Free Field : <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="220_2024_5208_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="20" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="146" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\phi : \mathbb {Z}^2 \rightarrow \mathbb {R}^N, N\ge 1\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>ϕ</mi> <mo>:</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">Z</mi> </mrow> <mn>2</mn> </msup> <mo stretchy="false">→</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mi> </mrow> <mi>N</mi> </msup> <mo>,</mo> <mi>N</mi> <mo>≥</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. We prove that, somewhat surprisingly, these sets are a.s. degenerate as long as <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="220_2024_5208_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="48" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(N\ge 2\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>N</mi> <mo>≥</mo> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, while they are conjectured to be macroscopic and fractal when <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="220_2024_5208_Article_IEq3.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="47" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(N=1\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>N</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. This analysis allows us, when <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="220_2024_5208_Article_IEq4.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="48" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(N\ge 2\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>N</mi> <mo>≥</mo> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, to understand the percolation properties of the level sets of <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="220_2024_5208_Article_IEq5.gif" Format="GIF" Height="20" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="134" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\{ \Vert \phi (x)\Vert _{{2}}, x\in \mathbb {Z}^2\}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">{</mo> <mo stretchy="false">‖</mo> <mi>ϕ</mi> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>x</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <msub> <mo stretchy="false">‖</mo> <mn>2</mn> </msub> <mo>,</mo> <mi>x</mi> <mo>∈</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">Z</mi> </mrow> <mn>2</mn> </msup> <mo stretchy="false">}</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and leads us to our second main motivation in this work: if one projects a spin <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="220_2024_5208_Article_IEq6.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="71" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(O(N+1)\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>O</mi> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>N</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>1</mn> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> model (the case <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="220_2024_5208_Article_IEq7.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="47" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(N=2\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>N</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> corresponds to the classical Heisenberg model) down to a spin <i>O</i>(<i>N</i>) model, we end up with a spin <i>O</i>(<i>N</i>) in a quenched disorder given by random conductances on <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="220_2024_5208_Article_IEq8.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="18" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathbb {Z}^2\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">Z</mi> </mrow> <mn>2</mn> </msup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. Using the <i>exit sets</i> of the <i>N</i>-vector-valued GFF, we obtain a local and geometric description of this random disorder in the limit <InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="220_2024_5208_Article_IEq9.gif" Format="GIF" Height="17" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="59" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\beta \rightarrow \infty \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>β</mi> <mo stretchy="false">→</mo> <mi>∞</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. This allows us in particular to revisit a series of celebrated works by Patrascioiu and Seiler (J Stat Phys 69(3):573–595, 1992, Nucl Phys B Proc Suppl 30:184–191, 1993, J Stat Phys 106(3):811–826, 2002) which argued against Polyakov’s prediction that spin <InlineEquation ID="IEq10"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="220_2024_5208_Article_IEq10.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="71" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(O(N+1)\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>O</mi> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>N</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>1</mn> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> model is massive at all temperatures as long as <InlineEquation ID="IEq11"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="220_2024_5208_Article_IEq11.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="48" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(N\ge 2\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>N</mi> <mo>≥</mo> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> (Polyakov in Phys Lett B 59(1):79–81, 1975). We make part of their arguments rigorous and more importantly we provide the following counter-example: we build ergodic environments of (arbitrary) high conductances with (arbitrary) small and disconnected regions of low conductances in which, despite the predominance of high conductances, the <i>XY</i> model remains massive. Of independent interest, we prove that at high <InlineEquation ID="IEq12"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="220_2024_5208_Article_IEq12.gif" Format="GIF" Height="17" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="15" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\beta \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>β</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, the fluctuations of a classical Heisenberg model near a north pointing spin are given by a <InlineEquation ID="IEq13"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="220_2024_5208_Article_IEq13.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="47" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(N=2\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>N</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> vectorial GFF. This is implicit for example in Polyakov (1975) but we give here the first (non-trivial) rigorous proof. Also, independently of the recent work Dubédat and Falconet (Random clusters in the villain and xy models, arXiv preprint <a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/2210.03620">arXiv:2210.03620</a>, 2022), we show that two-point correlation functions of the spin <i>O</i>(<i>N</i>) model can be given in terms of certain percolation events in the <i>cable graph</i> for any <InlineEquation ID="IEq14"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="220_2024_5208_Article_IEq14.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="48" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(N\ge 1\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>N</mi> <mo>≥</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Percolation for 2D Classical Heisenberg Model and Exit Sets of Vector Valued GFF

  • Juhan Aru,
  • Christophe Garban,
  • Avelio Sepúlveda

摘要

Our motivation in this paper is twofold. First, we study the geometry of a class of exploration sets, called exit sets, which are naturally associated with a 2D vector-valued Gaussian Free Field : \(\phi : \mathbb {Z}^2 \rightarrow \mathbb {R}^N, N\ge 1\) ϕ : Z 2 R N , N 1 . We prove that, somewhat surprisingly, these sets are a.s. degenerate as long as \(N\ge 2\) N 2 , while they are conjectured to be macroscopic and fractal when \(N=1\) N = 1 . This analysis allows us, when \(N\ge 2\) N 2 , to understand the percolation properties of the level sets of \(\{ \Vert \phi (x)\Vert _{{2}}, x\in \mathbb {Z}^2\}\) { ϕ ( x ) 2 , x Z 2 } and leads us to our second main motivation in this work: if one projects a spin \(O(N+1)\) O ( N + 1 ) model (the case \(N=2\) N = 2 corresponds to the classical Heisenberg model) down to a spin O(N) model, we end up with a spin O(N) in a quenched disorder given by random conductances on \(\mathbb {Z}^2\) Z 2 . Using the exit sets of the N-vector-valued GFF, we obtain a local and geometric description of this random disorder in the limit \(\beta \rightarrow \infty \) β . This allows us in particular to revisit a series of celebrated works by Patrascioiu and Seiler (J Stat Phys 69(3):573–595, 1992, Nucl Phys B Proc Suppl 30:184–191, 1993, J Stat Phys 106(3):811–826, 2002) which argued against Polyakov’s prediction that spin \(O(N+1)\) O ( N + 1 ) model is massive at all temperatures as long as \(N\ge 2\) N 2 (Polyakov in Phys Lett B 59(1):79–81, 1975). We make part of their arguments rigorous and more importantly we provide the following counter-example: we build ergodic environments of (arbitrary) high conductances with (arbitrary) small and disconnected regions of low conductances in which, despite the predominance of high conductances, the XY model remains massive. Of independent interest, we prove that at high \(\beta \) β , the fluctuations of a classical Heisenberg model near a north pointing spin are given by a \(N=2\) N = 2 vectorial GFF. This is implicit for example in Polyakov (1975) but we give here the first (non-trivial) rigorous proof. Also, independently of the recent work Dubédat and Falconet (Random clusters in the villain and xy models, arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.03620, 2022), we show that two-point correlation functions of the spin O(N) model can be given in terms of certain percolation events in the cable graph for any \(N\ge 1\) N 1 .