<p>In response theory, the hypervirial relations provide alternative formulations for the dynamic (frequency-dependent) molecular response properties. In this contribution, though the length formulation is the most commonly used in the calculations, we derive the full velocity formulations of the dynamic electric-dipole polarizability, <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="214_2025_3224_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="20" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="83" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\alpha _{\alpha \beta }(-\omega ;\omega )\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mi>α</mi> <mrow> <mi>α</mi> <mi>β</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mo>-</mo> <mi>ω</mi> <mo>;</mo> <mi>ω</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, and the dynamic electric-dipole second-harmonic generation first hyperpolarizability, <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="214_2025_3224_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="20" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="116" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\beta _{\alpha \beta \gamma }(-2\omega ;\omega ,\omega )\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mi>β</mi> <mrow> <mi>α</mi> <mi>β</mi> <mi>γ</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mo>-</mo> <mn>2</mn> <mi>ω</mi> <mo>;</mo> <mi>ω</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>ω</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. Both formulations provide identical responses for exact wavefunctions and for variationally optimized wavefunctions in the limit of a complete basis set. To assess how the exact relations between the length and velocity formulations are satisfied for approximate wavefunctions, we performed TD-DFT and TD-HF calculations of the frequency-dependent polarizability and first hyperpolarizability of <i>R</i>-methyloxirane molecule, using increasingly large basis sets. For <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="214_2025_3224_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="20" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="83" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\alpha _{\alpha \beta }(-\omega ;\omega )\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mi>α</mi> <mrow> <mi>α</mi> <mi>β</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mo>-</mo> <mi>ω</mi> <mo>;</mo> <mi>ω</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, the results reproduce the expected qualitative and quantitative trends, with convergence toward the same values when the basis-set size increases. However, for <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="214_2025_3224_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="20" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="116" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\beta _{\alpha \beta \gamma }(-2\omega ;\omega ,\omega )\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mi>β</mi> <mrow> <mi>α</mi> <mi>β</mi> <mi>γ</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mo>-</mo> <mn>2</mn> <mi>ω</mi> <mo>;</mo> <mi>ω</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>ω</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, the results are more contrasted. Though the convergence with the basis-set size is evident, the first hyperpolarizability difference between the two formulations is frequency dependent, whereas it is not when the relations are satisfied. Moreover, for <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="214_2025_3224_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="20" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="116" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\beta _{\alpha \beta \gamma }(-2\omega ;\omega ,\omega )\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mi>β</mi> <mrow> <mi>α</mi> <mi>β</mi> <mi>γ</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mo>-</mo> <mn>2</mn> <mi>ω</mi> <mo>;</mo> <mi>ω</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>ω</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, we analyzed some of the hyper-Rayleigh scattering main observables and it is clear that the full velocity formulation converges slowly compared with the length formulation.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Testing equivalent formulations of linear and nonlinear frequency-dependent electric-dipole polarizabilities

  • Andrea Bonvicini,
  • Benoît Champagne

摘要

In response theory, the hypervirial relations provide alternative formulations for the dynamic (frequency-dependent) molecular response properties. In this contribution, though the length formulation is the most commonly used in the calculations, we derive the full velocity formulations of the dynamic electric-dipole polarizability, \(\alpha _{\alpha \beta }(-\omega ;\omega )\) α α β ( - ω ; ω ) , and the dynamic electric-dipole second-harmonic generation first hyperpolarizability, \(\beta _{\alpha \beta \gamma }(-2\omega ;\omega ,\omega )\) β α β γ ( - 2 ω ; ω , ω ) . Both formulations provide identical responses for exact wavefunctions and for variationally optimized wavefunctions in the limit of a complete basis set. To assess how the exact relations between the length and velocity formulations are satisfied for approximate wavefunctions, we performed TD-DFT and TD-HF calculations of the frequency-dependent polarizability and first hyperpolarizability of R-methyloxirane molecule, using increasingly large basis sets. For \(\alpha _{\alpha \beta }(-\omega ;\omega )\) α α β ( - ω ; ω ) , the results reproduce the expected qualitative and quantitative trends, with convergence toward the same values when the basis-set size increases. However, for \(\beta _{\alpha \beta \gamma }(-2\omega ;\omega ,\omega )\) β α β γ ( - 2 ω ; ω , ω ) , the results are more contrasted. Though the convergence with the basis-set size is evident, the first hyperpolarizability difference between the two formulations is frequency dependent, whereas it is not when the relations are satisfied. Moreover, for \(\beta _{\alpha \beta \gamma }(-2\omega ;\omega ,\omega )\) β α β γ ( - 2 ω ; ω , ω ) , we analyzed some of the hyper-Rayleigh scattering main observables and it is clear that the full velocity formulation converges slowly compared with the length formulation.