<p>We prove global well-posedness and scattering for solutions to the mass-critical inhomogeneous nonlinear Schrödinger equation <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="209_2025_3855_Article_IEq3.gif" Format="GIF" Height="24" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="198" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(i\partial _{t}u+\Delta u=\pm |x|^{-b}|u|^{\frac{4-2b}{d}}u\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>i</mi> <msub> <mi>∂</mi> <mi>t</mi> </msub> <mi>u</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mi> <mi>u</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mo>±</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">|</mo> <mi>x</mi> <mo stretchy="false">|</mo> </mrow> <mrow> <mo>-</mo> <mi>b</mi> </mrow> </msup> <msup> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">|</mo> <mi>u</mi> <mo stretchy="false">|</mo> </mrow> <mfrac> <mrow> <mn>4</mn> <mo>-</mo> <mn>2</mn> <mi>b</mi> </mrow> <mi>d</mi> </mfrac> </msup> <mi>u</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> for large <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="209_2025_3855_Article_IEq4.gif" Format="GIF" Height="21" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="49" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(L^2({\mathbb {R}} ^d)\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msup> <mi>L</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msup> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mi> </mrow> <mi>d</mi> </msup> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> initial data with <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="209_2025_3855_Article_IEq5.gif" Format="GIF" Height="23" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="190" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(d\ge 3,0&lt;b&lt;\min \left\{ 2,\frac{d}{2} \right\} ;\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>d</mi> <mo>≥</mo> <mn>3</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>&lt;</mo> <mi>b</mi> <mo>&lt;</mo> <mo movablelimits="true">min</mo> <mfenced close="}" open="{"> <mn>2</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mfrac> <mi>d</mi> <mn>2</mn> </mfrac> </mfenced> <mo>;</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> in the focusing case, we require that the mass is strictly less than that of the ground state. Compared with the classical Schrödinger case <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="209_2025_3855_Article_IEq6.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="50" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\((b=0,\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>b</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>,</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> Dodson in J Am Math Soc 25:429–463, 2012, Adv. Math. 285:1589–1618, 2015), the main differences for the inhomogeneous case <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="209_2025_3855_Article_IEq7.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="52" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\((b&gt;0)\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>b</mi> <mo>&gt;</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> are that the presence of the inhomogeneity <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="209_2025_3855_Article_IEq8.gif" Format="GIF" Height="21" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="38" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(|x|^{-b}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msup> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">|</mo> <mi>x</mi> <mo stretchy="false">|</mo> </mrow> <mrow> <mo>-</mo> <mi>b</mi> </mrow> </msup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> creates a nontrivial singularity at the origin, and breaks the translation symmetry as well as the Galilean invariance of the equation, which makes the establishment of the profile decomposition and long time Strichartz estimates more difficult. To overcome these difficulties, we perform the concentration compactness/rigidity methods of Kenig and Merle (Invent Math 166:645–675, 2006) in the Lorentz space framework, and reduces the problem to the exclusion of almost periodic solutions. The exclusion of these solutions will utilize fractional estimates and long time Strichartz estimates in Lorentz spaces. In our study, we observe that the decay of the inhomogeneity <InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="209_2025_3855_Article_IEq8.gif" Format="GIF" Height="21" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="38" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(|x|^{-b}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msup> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">|</mo> <mi>x</mi> <mo stretchy="false">|</mo> </mrow> <mrow> <mo>-</mo> <mi>b</mi> </mrow> </msup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> at infinity prevents the concentration of the almost periodic solution at infinity in either physical or frequency space. Therefore, we can use classical Morawetz estimates, rather than interaction Morawetz estimates, to exclude the existence of the quasi-soliton. Moreover, our method can also be applied to the case <InlineEquation ID="IEq10"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="209_2025_3855_Article_IEq10.gif" Format="GIF" Height="17" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="44" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\( b = 0 ,\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>b</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>,</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> thereby recovering the scattering results in Tao et al. (Duke Math J 140:165–202, 2007) and Killip et al. (Anal PDE 1:229–266, 2008).</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Global well-posedness and scattering for mass-critical inhomogeneous NLS when \(d\ge 3\)

  • Xuan Liu,
  • Changxing Miao,
  • Jiqiang Zheng

摘要

We prove global well-posedness and scattering for solutions to the mass-critical inhomogeneous nonlinear Schrödinger equation \(i\partial _{t}u+\Delta u=\pm |x|^{-b}|u|^{\frac{4-2b}{d}}u\) i t u + Δ u = ± | x | - b | u | 4 - 2 b d u for large \(L^2({\mathbb {R}} ^d)\) L 2 ( R d ) initial data with \(d\ge 3,0<b<\min \left\{ 2,\frac{d}{2} \right\} ;\) d 3 , 0 < b < min 2 , d 2 ; in the focusing case, we require that the mass is strictly less than that of the ground state. Compared with the classical Schrödinger case \((b=0,\) ( b = 0 , Dodson in J Am Math Soc 25:429–463, 2012, Adv. Math. 285:1589–1618, 2015), the main differences for the inhomogeneous case \((b>0)\) ( b > 0 ) are that the presence of the inhomogeneity \(|x|^{-b}\) | x | - b creates a nontrivial singularity at the origin, and breaks the translation symmetry as well as the Galilean invariance of the equation, which makes the establishment of the profile decomposition and long time Strichartz estimates more difficult. To overcome these difficulties, we perform the concentration compactness/rigidity methods of Kenig and Merle (Invent Math 166:645–675, 2006) in the Lorentz space framework, and reduces the problem to the exclusion of almost periodic solutions. The exclusion of these solutions will utilize fractional estimates and long time Strichartz estimates in Lorentz spaces. In our study, we observe that the decay of the inhomogeneity \(|x|^{-b}\) | x | - b at infinity prevents the concentration of the almost periodic solution at infinity in either physical or frequency space. Therefore, we can use classical Morawetz estimates, rather than interaction Morawetz estimates, to exclude the existence of the quasi-soliton. Moreover, our method can also be applied to the case \( b = 0 ,\) b = 0 , thereby recovering the scattering results in Tao et al. (Duke Math J 140:165–202, 2007) and Killip et al. (Anal PDE 1:229–266, 2008).