<p>Let <i>f</i> be an <i>E</i>-function (in Siegel’s sense) not of the form <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(e^{\beta z}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msup> <mi>e</mi> <mrow> <mi>β</mi> <mi>z</mi> </mrow> </msup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\beta \in \overline{\mathbb {Q}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>β</mi> <mo>∈</mo> <mover> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">Q</mi> <mo>¯</mo> </mover> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, and let <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\log \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mo>log</mo> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> denote any fixed determination of the complex logarithm. We first prove that there exists a finite set <i>S</i>(<i>f</i>) such that for all <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\xi \in \overline{\mathbb {Q}}\setminus S(f)\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>ξ</mi> <mo>∈</mo> <mover> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">Q</mi> <mo>¯</mo> </mover> <mo lspace="0.15em" rspace="0.15em" stretchy="false">\</mo> <mi>S</mi> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>f</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\log (f(\xi ))\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mo>log</mo> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>f</mi> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>ξ</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> is a transcendental number. We then quantify this result when <i>f</i> is an <i>E</i>-function in the strict sense with rational coefficients, by proving an irrationality measure of <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\ln (f(\xi ))\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mo>ln</mo> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>f</mi> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>ξ</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> when <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\xi \in \mathbb Q\setminus S(f)\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>ξ</mi> <mo>∈</mo> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">Q</mi> <mo lspace="0.15em" rspace="0.15em" stretchy="false">\</mo> <mi>S</mi> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>f</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(f(\xi )&gt;0\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>f</mi> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>ξ</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> <mo>&gt;</mo> <mn>0</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. This measure implies that <InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\ln (f(\xi ))\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mo>ln</mo> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>f</mi> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>ξ</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> is not an ultra-Liouville number, as defined by Marques and Moreira. The proof of our first result, which is in fact more general, uses in particular a recent theorem of Delaygue. The proof of the second result, which is independent of the first one, is a consequence of a new linear independence measure for values of linearly independent <i>E</i>-functions in the strict sense with rational coefficients, where emphasis is put on other parameters than on the height, contrary to the case in Shidlovskii’s classical measure for instance.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Transcendence of values of logarithms of E-functions

  • Stéphane Fischler,
  • Tanguy Rivoal

摘要

Let f be an E-function (in Siegel’s sense) not of the form \(e^{\beta z}\) e β z , \(\beta \in \overline{\mathbb {Q}}\) β Q ¯ , and let \(\log \) log denote any fixed determination of the complex logarithm. We first prove that there exists a finite set S(f) such that for all \(\xi \in \overline{\mathbb {Q}}\setminus S(f)\) ξ Q ¯ \ S ( f ) , \(\log (f(\xi ))\) log ( f ( ξ ) ) is a transcendental number. We then quantify this result when f is an E-function in the strict sense with rational coefficients, by proving an irrationality measure of \(\ln (f(\xi ))\) ln ( f ( ξ ) ) when \(\xi \in \mathbb Q\setminus S(f)\) ξ Q \ S ( f ) and \(f(\xi )>0\) f ( ξ ) > 0 . This measure implies that \(\ln (f(\xi ))\) ln ( f ( ξ ) ) is not an ultra-Liouville number, as defined by Marques and Moreira. The proof of our first result, which is in fact more general, uses in particular a recent theorem of Delaygue. The proof of the second result, which is independent of the first one, is a consequence of a new linear independence measure for values of linearly independent E-functions in the strict sense with rational coefficients, where emphasis is put on other parameters than on the height, contrary to the case in Shidlovskii’s classical measure for instance.