<p>We consider the stationary problem for the quasi-geostrophic equation on the whole plane and investigate its well-posedness and ill-posedness. In the first author's previous study (Ann. PDE 10:10, 2024), it was shown that the two-dimensional stationary Navier–Stokes equations are ill-posed in the critical Besov spaces <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="208_2025_3236_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="32" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="67" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\dot{B}_{p,1}^{\frac{2}{p}-1}(\mathbb {R}^2)\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> with <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="208_2025_3236_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="72" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(1 \leqslant p \leqslant 2\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. Although the quasi-geostrophic equation has the same invariant scaling structure as the Navier–Stokes equations, we reveal that the quasi-geostrophic equation is well-posed in the scaling critical Besov spaces <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="208_2025_3236_Article_IEq3.gif" Format="GIF" Height="29" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="67" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\dot{B}_{p,q}^{\frac{2}{p}-1}(\mathbb {R}^2)\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> with <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="208_2025_3236_Article_IEq4.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="155" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\((p,q) \in [1,4) \times [1,\infty ]\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> or <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="208_2025_3236_Article_IEq5.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="96" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\((p,q)=(4,2)\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> due to the better properties of the nonlinear structure of the quasi-geostrophic equation compared to that of the Navier–Stokes equations. Moreover, we also prove the optimality for the above range of <InlineEquation ID="IEq511"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="208_2025_3236_Article_IEq511.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="38" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\((p,q)\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> ensuring the well-posedness in the sense that the stationary quasi-geostrophic equation is ill-posed for all the other cases.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Sharp well-posedness and ill-posedness of the stationary quasi-geostrophic equation

  • Mikihiro Fujii,
  • Tsukasa Iwabuchi

摘要

We consider the stationary problem for the quasi-geostrophic equation on the whole plane and investigate its well-posedness and ill-posedness. In the first author's previous study (Ann. PDE 10:10, 2024), it was shown that the two-dimensional stationary Navier–Stokes equations are ill-posed in the critical Besov spaces \(\dot{B}_{p,1}^{\frac{2}{p}-1}(\mathbb {R}^2)\) with \(1 \leqslant p \leqslant 2\) . Although the quasi-geostrophic equation has the same invariant scaling structure as the Navier–Stokes equations, we reveal that the quasi-geostrophic equation is well-posed in the scaling critical Besov spaces \(\dot{B}_{p,q}^{\frac{2}{p}-1}(\mathbb {R}^2)\) with \((p,q) \in [1,4) \times [1,\infty ]\) or \((p,q)=(4,2)\) due to the better properties of the nonlinear structure of the quasi-geostrophic equation compared to that of the Navier–Stokes equations. Moreover, we also prove the optimality for the above range of \((p,q)\) ensuring the well-posedness in the sense that the stationary quasi-geostrophic equation is ill-posed for all the other cases.