Scholarlink

<p>This position paper was collaboratively written during the international expert symposium “EU Chemicals Assessment - Risk- or Hazard-based?” that was organised by the German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR) in Berlin on November 27th and 28th 2025. Twenty experts from several institutions and European countries considered the scientific merits of both hazard-based and risk-based approaches to chemical safety assessment. While hazard information is essential, it does not reflect real-world exposure conditions that determine the likelihood of harm. On balance, we support a risk-based approach because it enables more proportionate, transparent and scientifically grounded regulatory decisions.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Regulation of chemicals demands assessment of risks rather than identification of hazards only

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年2月7日

查看全文
  • P. Marx-Stoelting,
  • V. Ritz,
  • M. Herzler,
  • C. Kneuer,
  • K. Aiello-Holden,
  • S Brescia,
  • S. E. Escher,
  • S. Feustel,
  • E. Fritsche,
  • J. Gebel,
  • E. F. Kenny,
  • R. Landsiedel,
  • P. Sanders,
  • M. Schwarz,
  • M Streitz,
  • E Testai,
  • B. van Ravenzwaay,
  • W. Waetjen,
  • K. Wend,
  • M. Wilks,
  • A. Luch,
  • T. Tralau,
  • A. Hensel

摘要

This position paper was collaboratively written during the international expert symposium “EU Chemicals Assessment - Risk- or Hazard-based?” that was organised by the German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR) in Berlin on November 27th and 28th 2025. Twenty experts from several institutions and European countries considered the scientific merits of both hazard-based and risk-based approaches to chemical safety assessment. While hazard information is essential, it does not reflect real-world exposure conditions that determine the likelihood of harm. On balance, we support a risk-based approach because it enables more proportionate, transparent and scientifically grounded regulatory decisions.