<p>An experimental and modeling study of the autoignition of <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\hbox {CH}_{4}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mtext>CH</mtext> <mn>4</mn> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>–<InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\hbox {O}_{2}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mtext>O</mtext> <mn>2</mn> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>–<InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\hbox {Ar}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mtext>Ar</mtext> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> mixtures with 0.25–4.0% <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\hbox {CH}_{\textrm{4}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mtext>CH</mtext> <mtext>4</mtext> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and 2.0% <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\hbox {O}_{\textrm{2}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mtext>O</mtext> <mtext>2</mtext> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> was performed at reflected shock wave conditions of <InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\sim \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mo>∼</mo> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>2&#xa0;atm and <InlineEquation ID="IEq10"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\sim \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mo>∼</mo> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>1600–2300&#xa0;K. The process was monitored by recording the absorption time profiles of <InlineEquation ID="IEq11"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\hbox {CH}_{\textrm{3}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mtext>CH</mtext> <mtext>3</mtext> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and OH radicals at 216.6&#xa0;nm and 306.772&#xa0;nm, respectively. The ignition delay time was determined in two ways: as the times it takes to reach the peak <InlineEquation ID="IEq12"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\hbox {CH}_{\textrm{3}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mtext>CH</mtext> <mtext>3</mtext> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> concentration or one-half of the maximum OH concentration. Kinetic simulations were carried out using a number of reaction mechanisms, and the predictions were compared to the measurements. An analysis of the sensitivity of the ignition delay time to the rate constants of various elementary stages was conducted, and the main reactions controlling the ignition process were identified. It was demonstrated that uncertainties in experimental conditions, such as the initial temperature and pressure rise rate, produce an effect comparable with that stemming from uncertainties in the rate constants of the key reactions.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Methane ignition behind reflected shock waves as monitored via \(\hbox {CH}_{3}\) and OH absorption

  • G. A. Shubin,
  • V. N. Smirnov,
  • P. A. Vlasov,
  • V. S. Arutyunov

摘要

An experimental and modeling study of the autoignition of \(\hbox {CH}_{4}\) CH 4 \(\hbox {O}_{2}\) O 2 \(\hbox {Ar}\) Ar mixtures with 0.25–4.0% \(\hbox {CH}_{\textrm{4}}\) CH 4 and 2.0% \(\hbox {O}_{\textrm{2}}\) O 2 was performed at reflected shock wave conditions of \(\sim \) 2 atm and \(\sim \) 1600–2300 K. The process was monitored by recording the absorption time profiles of \(\hbox {CH}_{\textrm{3}}\) CH 3 and OH radicals at 216.6 nm and 306.772 nm, respectively. The ignition delay time was determined in two ways: as the times it takes to reach the peak \(\hbox {CH}_{\textrm{3}}\) CH 3 concentration or one-half of the maximum OH concentration. Kinetic simulations were carried out using a number of reaction mechanisms, and the predictions were compared to the measurements. An analysis of the sensitivity of the ignition delay time to the rate constants of various elementary stages was conducted, and the main reactions controlling the ignition process were identified. It was demonstrated that uncertainties in experimental conditions, such as the initial temperature and pressure rise rate, produce an effect comparable with that stemming from uncertainties in the rate constants of the key reactions.