Scholarlink

Introduction and Hypothesis <p>Urogenital and rectovaginal fistulae are rare complications of pessary use for pelvic organ prolapse (POP). This systematic review investigates the prevalence of these complications in patients using pessary for POP, potential risk factors and approaches to their investigation and management.</p> Methods <p>All studies in English reporting urogenital or rectovaginal fistulae secondary to pessaries for POP were eligible for inclusion. AMED, CINAHL, MedLine, Scopus and Web of Science databases were searched from inception to March 2024. Risk of bias was assessed using validated tools: Murad et al.’s tool for case series/reports and ROBINS-I for non-randomised studies. Quantitative synthesis of descriptive statistics and narrative summary were performed.</p> Results <p>Two retrospective studies and 60 case series/reports were included, describing 76 fistulae (34 urogenital, 42 rectovaginal). The retrospective studies estimated the prevalence of fistulae to be 3%. Of reported fistulae, 45% occurred with Gellhorn, 16% with ring, 11% with shelf and 9% with cube pessaries. Fifty percent were associated with neglected pessary care. Conservative management resulted in size reduction or resolution in 69% of fistulae: this approach should be considered. Vaginal (88%) and abdominal (100%) vesicovaginal fistula repairs were successful. Diverting ostomies were popular for rectovaginal fistulae but often resulted in permanent stoma without reducing mortality, recurrence or repair failure. Colpocleisis represents an effective procedure for managing co-existing POP.</p> Conclusions <p>The prevalence of fistulae from pessary use is likely &lt; 1% but may rise to 3% with risk factors present, including Gellhorn pessaries and neglected care. Both conservative and surgical management are viable treatment options.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Fistulae Secondary to Vaginal Pessary Use for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Systematic Review

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年1月20日

查看全文
  • Thomas James Curtis,
  • Charlotte Chant,
  • Stuart Quek,
  • Ilias Giarenis,
  • Thomas Giles Gray

摘要

Introduction and Hypothesis

Urogenital and rectovaginal fistulae are rare complications of pessary use for pelvic organ prolapse (POP). This systematic review investigates the prevalence of these complications in patients using pessary for POP, potential risk factors and approaches to their investigation and management.

Methods

All studies in English reporting urogenital or rectovaginal fistulae secondary to pessaries for POP were eligible for inclusion. AMED, CINAHL, MedLine, Scopus and Web of Science databases were searched from inception to March 2024. Risk of bias was assessed using validated tools: Murad et al.’s tool for case series/reports and ROBINS-I for non-randomised studies. Quantitative synthesis of descriptive statistics and narrative summary were performed.

Results

Two retrospective studies and 60 case series/reports were included, describing 76 fistulae (34 urogenital, 42 rectovaginal). The retrospective studies estimated the prevalence of fistulae to be 3%. Of reported fistulae, 45% occurred with Gellhorn, 16% with ring, 11% with shelf and 9% with cube pessaries. Fifty percent were associated with neglected pessary care. Conservative management resulted in size reduction or resolution in 69% of fistulae: this approach should be considered. Vaginal (88%) and abdominal (100%) vesicovaginal fistula repairs were successful. Diverting ostomies were popular for rectovaginal fistulae but often resulted in permanent stoma without reducing mortality, recurrence or repair failure. Colpocleisis represents an effective procedure for managing co-existing POP.

Conclusions

The prevalence of fistulae from pessary use is likely < 1% but may rise to 3% with risk factors present, including Gellhorn pessaries and neglected care. Both conservative and surgical management are viable treatment options.