<p>Prior studies on the relationship between decentralization of decision rights and variable compensation have largely focused on higher managerial levels and typically find a complementarity association. We extend this literature by examining this relationship at the production level, where managers oversee multidimensional tasks and where performance outcomes are often hard to contract upon. This makes the standard complementarity prediction less apparent and suggests a substitutive relationship instead. Using survey data from production managers in industrial firms, we find that the incentive intensity of variable compensation and decentralization of decision rights act as substitutes: production departments with greater decision rights have a lower level of variable compensation for their managers. Consistent with the role of performance contracting conditions, this negative association weakens with higher levels of performance contractibility—i.e., in more stable operational environments and when evaluation relies on more high-quality measures. Overall, the findings highlight that the incentive–decentralization relationship may differ systematically between production settings and higher managerial levels.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Variable compensation and decentralization of decision rights at the production level: the importance of performance contractibility

  • Paula Dirks,
  • Yuping Jia

摘要

Prior studies on the relationship between decentralization of decision rights and variable compensation have largely focused on higher managerial levels and typically find a complementarity association. We extend this literature by examining this relationship at the production level, where managers oversee multidimensional tasks and where performance outcomes are often hard to contract upon. This makes the standard complementarity prediction less apparent and suggests a substitutive relationship instead. Using survey data from production managers in industrial firms, we find that the incentive intensity of variable compensation and decentralization of decision rights act as substitutes: production departments with greater decision rights have a lower level of variable compensation for their managers. Consistent with the role of performance contracting conditions, this negative association weakens with higher levels of performance contractibility—i.e., in more stable operational environments and when evaluation relies on more high-quality measures. Overall, the findings highlight that the incentive–decentralization relationship may differ systematically between production settings and higher managerial levels.