<p>Penalized regression methods that shrink model coefficients are popular approaches to improve prediction and for variable selection in high-dimensional settings. We present a penalized (or regularized) regression approach for multinomial logistic models for categorical outcomes with a novel adaptive L1-type penalty term, that incorporates weights based on intra- and inter-outcome category distances of each predictor. A predictor that has large between- and small within-outcome category distances is penalized less and has a higher likelihood to be selected for the final model. We propose and study three measures for weight calculation: an analysis of variance (ANOVA)-based measure and two indices used in clustering approaches. Our novel approach, that we term the <i>discriminative power lasso</i> (DP-lasso), thus combines elements of marginal screening with regularized regression methods. We studied the performance of DP-lasso and other published methods in simulations with varying numbers of outcome categories, numbers of predictors, strengths of associations and predictor correlation structures. For correlated predictors, the DP-lasso approach with ANOVA based weights (DPan) resulted in much sparser models than other regularization approaches, especially in high-dimensional settings. When the number <i>p</i> of (correlated) predictors was much larger than the available sample size <i>N</i>, DPan had the highest true positive rate while maintaining low false positive rates for all simulation settings. Similarly, when <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="180_2025_1635_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="17" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="50" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({p&lt;N}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>p</mi> <mo>&lt;</mo> <mi>N</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, DPan had high true positive rates and the lowest false positive rates of all methods studied. Thus we recommend DPan for analysing categorical outcomes in relation to high-dimensional predictors. We further illustrate all approaches in ultra high-dimensional settings, using several single-cell RNA-sequencing datasets.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

A powerful penalized multinomial logistic regression approach

  • Cornelia Fuetterer,
  • Malte Nalenz,
  • Thomas Augustin,
  • Ruth M. Pfeiffer

摘要

Penalized regression methods that shrink model coefficients are popular approaches to improve prediction and for variable selection in high-dimensional settings. We present a penalized (or regularized) regression approach for multinomial logistic models for categorical outcomes with a novel adaptive L1-type penalty term, that incorporates weights based on intra- and inter-outcome category distances of each predictor. A predictor that has large between- and small within-outcome category distances is penalized less and has a higher likelihood to be selected for the final model. We propose and study three measures for weight calculation: an analysis of variance (ANOVA)-based measure and two indices used in clustering approaches. Our novel approach, that we term the discriminative power lasso (DP-lasso), thus combines elements of marginal screening with regularized regression methods. We studied the performance of DP-lasso and other published methods in simulations with varying numbers of outcome categories, numbers of predictors, strengths of associations and predictor correlation structures. For correlated predictors, the DP-lasso approach with ANOVA based weights (DPan) resulted in much sparser models than other regularization approaches, especially in high-dimensional settings. When the number p of (correlated) predictors was much larger than the available sample size N, DPan had the highest true positive rate while maintaining low false positive rates for all simulation settings. Similarly, when \({p<N}\) p < N , DPan had high true positive rates and the lowest false positive rates of all methods studied. Thus we recommend DPan for analysing categorical outcomes in relation to high-dimensional predictors. We further illustrate all approaches in ultra high-dimensional settings, using several single-cell RNA-sequencing datasets.