<p>Thin-walled impeller blade curvature changes in the milling process. Low stiffness and other factors result in large milling processing errors. To compensate for online blade milling machining errors, this paper proposes a milling machining error prediction method by considering the curved surface features and deformation of the blade. First, based on the tool-workpiece contact relationship of blade curvature and machining deformation, undeformed and deformation chip thickness models are constructed to analyze the influence of curvature change and deformation on the chip thickness. Then, the variation of chip thickness in the cutter coordinate system is converted to the surface coordinate system, and the surface normal vector of the variation is taken as the predicted machining error. Finally, corresponding experiments are conducted on a five-axis machine, and experimental results indicate that the difference between the predicted machining error and the measured one is controlled within 21%.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Error analysis of blade milling considering surface features and deformation

  • Shi Wu,
  • Chunfeng Wang,
  • Xianli Liu,
  • Yupeng Wang,
  • Yong Zhang

摘要

Thin-walled impeller blade curvature changes in the milling process. Low stiffness and other factors result in large milling processing errors. To compensate for online blade milling machining errors, this paper proposes a milling machining error prediction method by considering the curved surface features and deformation of the blade. First, based on the tool-workpiece contact relationship of blade curvature and machining deformation, undeformed and deformation chip thickness models are constructed to analyze the influence of curvature change and deformation on the chip thickness. Then, the variation of chip thickness in the cutter coordinate system is converted to the surface coordinate system, and the surface normal vector of the variation is taken as the predicted machining error. Finally, corresponding experiments are conducted on a five-axis machine, and experimental results indicate that the difference between the predicted machining error and the measured one is controlled within 21%.