<p>Recent research shows that contemporary autocracies differ from their predecessors: Rather than deterring opposition through violent repression (Dictatorship of Fear), most autocrats today pretend to be democratic and rely on propaganda and co-optation of the educated elite (Informational Autocracy). How this new form of autocracy emerged is not fully understood. My theory is that more emigration opportunities for the educated elite were a contributing factor. The theory suggests that immigration policies of high-income countries in favor of educated foreigners, such as the H-1B visa in the United States, can have ambivalent effects on democratization in foreigners’ origin countries—promoting a transition from Dictatorship of Fear to Informational Autocracy but obstructing the transition to Democracy. The theory also illuminates why Dictators of Fear often restrict emigration while Informational Autocrats do not. Finally, it provides a novel explanation for the “economic growth failures” of autocracies.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Migration and informational autocracy

  • Michael Christian Lehmann

摘要

Recent research shows that contemporary autocracies differ from their predecessors: Rather than deterring opposition through violent repression (Dictatorship of Fear), most autocrats today pretend to be democratic and rely on propaganda and co-optation of the educated elite (Informational Autocracy). How this new form of autocracy emerged is not fully understood. My theory is that more emigration opportunities for the educated elite were a contributing factor. The theory suggests that immigration policies of high-income countries in favor of educated foreigners, such as the H-1B visa in the United States, can have ambivalent effects on democratization in foreigners’ origin countries—promoting a transition from Dictatorship of Fear to Informational Autocracy but obstructing the transition to Democracy. The theory also illuminates why Dictators of Fear often restrict emigration while Informational Autocrats do not. Finally, it provides a novel explanation for the “economic growth failures” of autocracies.