Scholarlink

<p>Critical scholarship on artificial intelligence has largely operated within a binary: human tacit knowledge must be preserved against algorithmic encroachment, or its displacement must be mourned. This paper argues that the binary is insufficient. Through a philo-technical inquiry method: the constellation of multiple intellectual traditions&#xa0;deployed to interrogate the object of study, the paper excavates and deploys Polanyi’s phenomenology, Bourdieu’s field theory, and Simondon’s philosophy of individuation—constellated through Adorno’s method of arranging multiple traditions around an object that resists subsumption under any single framework—with Hall’s articulation theory as critical counterweight. Their convergence reveals that the encounter between human tacit sensing and algorithmic processing generates a <i>third field</i>: an associated milieu in which emergent knowing arises that is reducible to neither order. The paper names this emergence <i>Synexis,</i> and argues that what the critical literature diagnoses as loss is, in significant part, <i>misrecognition</i>: the capital that tacit capacities represent is being reconverted, not destroyed, but the reconversion is invisible to the prevailing vocabulary. The paper examines the forces of capture that threaten the third field and offers propositions for inhabiting it deliberately. The contribution is productive reorientation: moving the discourse beyond elegy towards the more demanding question of what it means to work, learn, and govern where human and algorithmic knowing are already producing something neither can produce alone.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

The third field: tacit knowledge, algorithmic agency, and the emergence of Synexis

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年6月16日

查看全文
  • Donald Harper

摘要

Critical scholarship on artificial intelligence has largely operated within a binary: human tacit knowledge must be preserved against algorithmic encroachment, or its displacement must be mourned. This paper argues that the binary is insufficient. Through a philo-technical inquiry method: the constellation of multiple intellectual traditions deployed to interrogate the object of study, the paper excavates and deploys Polanyi’s phenomenology, Bourdieu’s field theory, and Simondon’s philosophy of individuation—constellated through Adorno’s method of arranging multiple traditions around an object that resists subsumption under any single framework—with Hall’s articulation theory as critical counterweight. Their convergence reveals that the encounter between human tacit sensing and algorithmic processing generates a third field: an associated milieu in which emergent knowing arises that is reducible to neither order. The paper names this emergence Synexis, and argues that what the critical literature diagnoses as loss is, in significant part, misrecognition: the capital that tacit capacities represent is being reconverted, not destroyed, but the reconversion is invisible to the prevailing vocabulary. The paper examines the forces of capture that threaten the third field and offers propositions for inhabiting it deliberately. The contribution is productive reorientation: moving the discourse beyond elegy towards the more demanding question of what it means to work, learn, and govern where human and algorithmic knowing are already producing something neither can produce alone.