Scholarlink

<p>In this paper, we present an overview of the main conceptual framework for trustworthy AI and argue that the network account offers a superior alternative. We identify and illustrate the possible nodes within an AI network, specify the key attributes each node should possess, and clarify what constitutes a sufficient threshold for each attribute. Building on this foundation, we introduce a novel framework for the network account of trustworthy AI: Lexical Threshold-Based Multidimensional Utility Theory (LTMU). This framework lexically ranks trust-relevant attributes, establishes minimum thresholds for each and assesses each attribute with a distinct utility scale. We then demonstrate how the LTMU framework can be applied to analyse two exceptional cases in which trust-relevant attributes come into conflict in different ways, arguing that its application yields reasonable and defensible outcomes in both scenarios. </p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Beyond the algorithm: rethinking the network account of trustworthy ai through lexical threshold-based multidimensional utility analysis

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年3月4日

查看全文
  • Fei Song,
  • Julian Savulescu,
  • Michael Dunn

摘要

In this paper, we present an overview of the main conceptual framework for trustworthy AI and argue that the network account offers a superior alternative. We identify and illustrate the possible nodes within an AI network, specify the key attributes each node should possess, and clarify what constitutes a sufficient threshold for each attribute. Building on this foundation, we introduce a novel framework for the network account of trustworthy AI: Lexical Threshold-Based Multidimensional Utility Theory (LTMU). This framework lexically ranks trust-relevant attributes, establishes minimum thresholds for each and assesses each attribute with a distinct utility scale. We then demonstrate how the LTMU framework can be applied to analyse two exceptional cases in which trust-relevant attributes come into conflict in different ways, arguing that its application yields reasonable and defensible outcomes in both scenarios.