<p>This study explores how artificial intelligence reshapes the long-standing relationship between individualism and collectivism. It argues that AI does not simply shift the balance between these perspectives, but transforms how they coexist and evolve in contemporary societies. Drawing on Deleuze’s idea of <i>Societies of Control</i> and Taylor’s theory of <i>self-determining individualism</i>, the paper introduces two related concepts: AIndividualism and Algorithmic Collectivism. The first describes new forms of hyper-personalized autonomy produced through algorithmic personalization and continuous data feedback. The second refers to emerging modes of collective identity and coordinated action that develop within digital infrastructures guided by algorithms. By examining these dynamics together, the study shows that technology can both expand individual agency and cultivate collective forms of organization. AI enhances self-determination while also generating algorithmic collectivities that influence belonging, meaning, and social coordination. These intertwined processes reveal a central paradox of digital modernity: technology empowers individuals even as it aligns them through shared algorithmic systems. The discussion moves beyond binary thinking about autonomy and community, suggesting that both now unfold within the same technological frameworks. Understanding this dual process is crucial for developing ethical and policy responses that reflect AI’s impact on human agency and social life. The paper concludes that the challenge of the AI age is not to choose between the individual and the collective, but to sustain both in a balanced and responsible way within an increasingly algorithmic world.</p>