Scholarlink

Objective <p>These European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) guidelines provide recommendations for the diagnosis of shock and hemodynamic monitoring for adult critically ill patients.</p> Methods <p>An international panel of experts formulated PICO-formatted questions, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was applied to assess evidence and formulate recommendations. In the absence of strong evidence, panelists issued ungraded good practice statements (UGPS).</p> Results <p>Panelists issued 50 statements. Among others, skin perfusion should be monitored using the assessment of capillary refill time, and this may be complemented by the assessment of skin temperature and mottling (UGPS). In patients with a central venous catheter, serial measurements of (central) venous oxygen saturation and of the veno-arterial difference in carbon dioxide partial pressure should be performed (UGPS). In patients with persistent shock after initial fluid resuscitation, fluid responsiveness should be assessed before continuing fluid resuscitation (UGPS). It is recommended to use dynamic variables over static markers of preload for predicting fluid responsiveness, when applicable (graded statement). Cardiac output (CO) and/or stroke volume should be monitored in patients who do not respond to initial therapy (UGPS). Arterial pressure should be monitored with an arterial catheter in shock that is not responsive to initial therapy and/or requiring vasopressor infusion (UGPS), and central venous pressure should be measured in patients who have a central venous catheter (UGPS). Panelists suggest using echocardiography as the first-line imaging modality to assess the type of shock (graded statement). Echocardiographically defined phenotypes of left and right ventricular dysfunction may be of prognostic significance (UGPS).</p> Conclusions <p>The panel made 50 recommendations on shock diagnosis and hemodynamic monitoring.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

ESICM guidelines on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring 2025

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年11月14日

查看全文
  • Xavier Monnet,
  • Antonio Messina,
  • Massimiliano Greco,
  • Jan Bakker,
  • Nadia Aissaoui,
  • Maurizio Cecconi,
  • Giacomo Coppalini,
  • Daniel De Backer,
  • Vanina Kanoore Edul,
  • Laura Evans,
  • Glenn Hernández,
  • Oliver Hunsicker,
  • Can Ince,
  • Thomas Kaufmann,
  • Bruno Levy,
  • Manu L. N. G. Malbrain,
  • Alexandre Mebazaa,
  • Sheila Nainan Myatra,
  • Marlies Ostermann,
  • Michael R. Pinsky,
  • Bernd Saugel,
  • Marzia Savi,
  • Mervyn Singer,
  • Jean-Louis Teboul,
  • Antoine Vieillard-Baron,
  • Jean-Louis Vincent,
  • Michelle S. Chew

摘要

Objective

These European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) guidelines provide recommendations for the diagnosis of shock and hemodynamic monitoring for adult critically ill patients.

Methods

An international panel of experts formulated PICO-formatted questions, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was applied to assess evidence and formulate recommendations. In the absence of strong evidence, panelists issued ungraded good practice statements (UGPS).

Results

Panelists issued 50 statements. Among others, skin perfusion should be monitored using the assessment of capillary refill time, and this may be complemented by the assessment of skin temperature and mottling (UGPS). In patients with a central venous catheter, serial measurements of (central) venous oxygen saturation and of the veno-arterial difference in carbon dioxide partial pressure should be performed (UGPS). In patients with persistent shock after initial fluid resuscitation, fluid responsiveness should be assessed before continuing fluid resuscitation (UGPS). It is recommended to use dynamic variables over static markers of preload for predicting fluid responsiveness, when applicable (graded statement). Cardiac output (CO) and/or stroke volume should be monitored in patients who do not respond to initial therapy (UGPS). Arterial pressure should be monitored with an arterial catheter in shock that is not responsive to initial therapy and/or requiring vasopressor infusion (UGPS), and central venous pressure should be measured in patients who have a central venous catheter (UGPS). Panelists suggest using echocardiography as the first-line imaging modality to assess the type of shock (graded statement). Echocardiographically defined phenotypes of left and right ventricular dysfunction may be of prognostic significance (UGPS).

Conclusions

The panel made 50 recommendations on shock diagnosis and hemodynamic monitoring.