Scholarlink

Introduction <p>Kinesiotaping (KT) has gained popularity in rehabilitation and sports medicine, reducing pain, improving range of motion (ROM) and enhancing proprioception; however, there is no recommendation in support of KT following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and the evidence is controversial. The present meta-analysis investigated the efficacy of KT after primary TKA. The outcomes of interest are the improvement in ROM and pain using the visual analogue scale (VAS).</p> Methods <p>This meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the 2020 PRISMA statement. In December 2025, the following databases were accessed: PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar and Embase. No time constraint was set for the search. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing KT versus a&#xa0;group of patients who did not undergo KT following TKA were accessed. Only studies with level&#xa0;I evidence, according to the Oxford Centre of Evidence-Based Medicine, were considered.</p> Results <p>Data from 374 TKAs were retrieved and 85% (313 of 374 patients) were women. The mean follow-up length was 35.6 ± 33.8 days. The mean age of the patients was 67.1 ± 2.8&#xa0;years and the mean BMI was 30.5 ± 1.6 kg/m<sup>2</sup>. At baseline, between-group comparability was evidenced in the male:female ratio, mean age, mean BMI, knee flexion and VAS. No differences were found in flexion (<i>P</i> = 0.8) and VAS (<i>P</i> = 0.6).</p> Conclusion <p>The current level of evidence does not support the use of KT in primary TKA. Additional RCTs are necessary to establish the potential of KT in primary TKA.</p> <p>Level of evidence: level&#xa0;I, meta-analysis of RCTs.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Kinesiotaping following primary total knee arthroplasty

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年3月3日

查看全文
  • Filippo Migliorini,
  • Luise Schäfer,
  • Tommaso Bardazzi,
  • Michael Kurt Memminger,
  • Francesco Simeone,
  • Riccardo Giorgino,
  • Nicola Maffulli

摘要

Introduction

Kinesiotaping (KT) has gained popularity in rehabilitation and sports medicine, reducing pain, improving range of motion (ROM) and enhancing proprioception; however, there is no recommendation in support of KT following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and the evidence is controversial. The present meta-analysis investigated the efficacy of KT after primary TKA. The outcomes of interest are the improvement in ROM and pain using the visual analogue scale (VAS).

Methods

This meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the 2020 PRISMA statement. In December 2025, the following databases were accessed: PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar and Embase. No time constraint was set for the search. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing KT versus a group of patients who did not undergo KT following TKA were accessed. Only studies with level I evidence, according to the Oxford Centre of Evidence-Based Medicine, were considered.

Results

Data from 374 TKAs were retrieved and 85% (313 of 374 patients) were women. The mean follow-up length was 35.6 ± 33.8 days. The mean age of the patients was 67.1 ± 2.8 years and the mean BMI was 30.5 ± 1.6 kg/m2. At baseline, between-group comparability was evidenced in the male:female ratio, mean age, mean BMI, knee flexion and VAS. No differences were found in flexion (P = 0.8) and VAS (P = 0.6).

Conclusion

The current level of evidence does not support the use of KT in primary TKA. Additional RCTs are necessary to establish the potential of KT in primary TKA.

Level of evidence: level I, meta-analysis of RCTs.