Purpose <p>The study aim was to investigate the long-term outcomes after hardware removal (HR) in patients with blunt chest trauma. We hypothesized that HR might be beneficial in indicated patients to improve patient health.</p> Methods <p>We performed a retrospective single-center study between 2017 and 2023. Descriptive statistics were used for the analysis. One study-specific follow-up visit was conducted, 28 months (range 3–72) after HR. The study-specific health survey used, consisted of four functional dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, mental health) and two symptom dimensions (thoracic pain, chest tightness) which were rated on a numerical scale and compared to the status before HR in four categories (much better to worse).</p> Results <p>Of the 28 patients, the average age was 59 years (range 29–83), 12 fractures (1–39) were fixed, and 4 implants (1–11) were used. The indications for HR were persistent thoracic pain (36%), discomfort (25%), chest tightness (21%), hardware dislocation (11%) and hardware infection (7%). HR was performed 18 months (5 days-104 months) after surgery for trauma. Patients with chest tightness and infection exhibited the greatest improvement in symptoms (75%), followed by those with hardware dislocation (61%). The improvement rate in the other 2 groups was 58%. All patients who experienced chest tightness, hardware dislocation and infection were completely satisfied and would undergo HR again.</p> Conclusion <p>HR is safe and feasible, resulting in significant symptom relief and improvement in health status in approximately two-thirds of patients. In indicated patients, HR might be performed earlier and more liberally if symptoms are disabling.</p> Clinical trial registration number <p>NCT06003595 registered on July 18, 2023.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Long-term outcomes after removal of rib stabilization hardware in patients with blunt chest trauma

  • Maria B. Svec,
  • Helga Bachmann,
  • Aljaz Hojski,
  • Eric F. Macharia-Nimietz,
  • Sandrine V. C. Dackam,
  • Didier Lardinois

摘要

Purpose

The study aim was to investigate the long-term outcomes after hardware removal (HR) in patients with blunt chest trauma. We hypothesized that HR might be beneficial in indicated patients to improve patient health.

Methods

We performed a retrospective single-center study between 2017 and 2023. Descriptive statistics were used for the analysis. One study-specific follow-up visit was conducted, 28 months (range 3–72) after HR. The study-specific health survey used, consisted of four functional dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, mental health) and two symptom dimensions (thoracic pain, chest tightness) which were rated on a numerical scale and compared to the status before HR in four categories (much better to worse).

Results

Of the 28 patients, the average age was 59 years (range 29–83), 12 fractures (1–39) were fixed, and 4 implants (1–11) were used. The indications for HR were persistent thoracic pain (36%), discomfort (25%), chest tightness (21%), hardware dislocation (11%) and hardware infection (7%). HR was performed 18 months (5 days-104 months) after surgery for trauma. Patients with chest tightness and infection exhibited the greatest improvement in symptoms (75%), followed by those with hardware dislocation (61%). The improvement rate in the other 2 groups was 58%. All patients who experienced chest tightness, hardware dislocation and infection were completely satisfied and would undergo HR again.

Conclusion

HR is safe and feasible, resulting in significant symptom relief and improvement in health status in approximately two-thirds of patients. In indicated patients, HR might be performed earlier and more liberally if symptoms are disabling.

Clinical trial registration number

NCT06003595 registered on July 18, 2023.