Scholarlink

Purpose <p>The central vein sign (CVS) is a&#xa0;promising imaging biomarker for multiple sclerosis (MS) diagnosis. While isotropic T2* at 3 T and 7 T has demonstrated high diagnostic performance, its utility at 1.5 T remains unclear. This study evaluates the performance of unenhanced FLAIR-T2* fusion at 1.5 T compared to 3 T in MS participants.</p> Methods <p>This prospective observational study included 20 MS patients and 20&#xa0;control subjects. Each participant underwent unenhanced isotropic Epi-T2* and isotropic FLAIR (0.8 mm voxel size) at both 1.5 T and 3 T. Subsequently, the derived isotropic T2* and FLAIR were combined to create the final FLAIR-T2* fusion in both magnetic field strengths. Two independent raters assessed the CVS status of white matter (WM) lesions using NAIMS criteria. WM lesions were classified as CVS+ or CVS-, and two methods—select-n* and CVS+ proportion—were applied. Sensitivity and specificity were computed, and CVS performance was compared across WM lesion locations.</p> Results <p>Among eligible WM lesions (MS: 258; controls: 255), the mean CVS+ lesion proportion per participant was 66.9 ± 15.4% for 1.5 T FLAIR-T2* and 77.0 ± 13.6% for 3 T FLAIR-T2* (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). At a&#xa0;40% threshold, 1.5 T FLAIR-T2* achieved 90% sensitivity and 95% specificity, while 3 T FLAIR-T2* achieved 100% sensitivity and 95% specificity. The Select-6* method resulted in only one MS patient being misclassified at both field strengths. 3 T FLAIR-T2* detected more CVS+ lesions in deep WM (87.5% vs. 57.1%, <i>p</i> = 0.05).</p> Conclusion <p>1.5 T FLAIR-T2* fusion demonstrates high performance in CVS assessment, although slightly outperformed by 3 T FLAIR-T2*. The select-6* method may enhance 1.5 T performance, supporting its feasibility for CVS evaluation.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Diagnostic Accuracy of Isotropic FLAIR-T2* Fusion Imaging for Central Vein Sign Detection in Multiple Sclerosis: a Comparative Study at 1.5 T and 3 T

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年6月16日

查看全文
  • Yunus Emre Senturk,
  • Ahmet Peker,
  • Hande Ozen Atalay,
  • Ayse Altintas,
  • Ali Yusuf Oner

摘要

Purpose

The central vein sign (CVS) is a promising imaging biomarker for multiple sclerosis (MS) diagnosis. While isotropic T2* at 3 T and 7 T has demonstrated high diagnostic performance, its utility at 1.5 T remains unclear. This study evaluates the performance of unenhanced FLAIR-T2* fusion at 1.5 T compared to 3 T in MS participants.

Methods

This prospective observational study included 20 MS patients and 20 control subjects. Each participant underwent unenhanced isotropic Epi-T2* and isotropic FLAIR (0.8 mm voxel size) at both 1.5 T and 3 T. Subsequently, the derived isotropic T2* and FLAIR were combined to create the final FLAIR-T2* fusion in both magnetic field strengths. Two independent raters assessed the CVS status of white matter (WM) lesions using NAIMS criteria. WM lesions were classified as CVS+ or CVS-, and two methods—select-n* and CVS+ proportion—were applied. Sensitivity and specificity were computed, and CVS performance was compared across WM lesion locations.

Results

Among eligible WM lesions (MS: 258; controls: 255), the mean CVS+ lesion proportion per participant was 66.9 ± 15.4% for 1.5 T FLAIR-T2* and 77.0 ± 13.6% for 3 T FLAIR-T2* (p < 0.01). At a 40% threshold, 1.5 T FLAIR-T2* achieved 90% sensitivity and 95% specificity, while 3 T FLAIR-T2* achieved 100% sensitivity and 95% specificity. The Select-6* method resulted in only one MS patient being misclassified at both field strengths. 3 T FLAIR-T2* detected more CVS+ lesions in deep WM (87.5% vs. 57.1%, p = 0.05).

Conclusion

1.5 T FLAIR-T2* fusion demonstrates high performance in CVS assessment, although slightly outperformed by 3 T FLAIR-T2*. The select-6* method may enhance 1.5 T performance, supporting its feasibility for CVS evaluation.