Scholarlink

Objective <p>To evaluate the in&#xa0;vivo accuracy of guided palatal miniscrew insertion, focusing on the effect of insertion side, frontal insertion angle, and miniscrew length.</p> Materials and methods <p>In all, 52 palatal miniscrews were inserted using computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) surgical guides in 20&#xa0;patients (average age: 19.74 years ± 6.83). Digital models were acquired after miniscrew insertion and scanbody application. Then, linear and angular discrepancies between planned and realized miniscrew positions were evaluated by superimposing the reference model with the final postinsertion model. Discrepancies are recorded and compared to absolute precision (hypothetical). The effect of side, frontal insertion angle, and miniscrew length on accuracy were investigated.</p> Results <p>Mean linear total discrepancies were 1.10 ± 1.01 mm and 1.71 ± 1.10 mm at the miniscrew head and tip points, respectively. Mean angular discrepancies were 5.90 ± 6.06° in the transverse (XY), 2.65 ± 2.47° in the sagittal (YZ), and 3.02 ± 2.65° in the coronal (XZ) plane. All discrepancies were significantly different to absolute precision (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), although not to an extent considered clinically relevant. Neither side nor frontal insertion angle (clinical factors), or miniscrew length (structural factor) significantly impacted accuracy.</p> Conclusion <p>CAD/CAM surgical guides ensured clinically acceptable accuracy despite significant deviations from absolute precision. The insertion side, frontal insertion angle, and miniscrew length had minimal influence on accuracy, and therefore on outcome. Further studies should explore the effects of additional clinical, procedural, anatomical, and structural variables.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Factors influencing the accuracy of guided palatal miniscrew insertion in young adults

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年3月3日

查看全文
  • Mario Palone,
  • Filippo Pepe,
  • Claudia Grotteria,
  • Francesca Cremonini,
  • Giuliano Bortolo Maino,
  • Luca Brucculeri,
  • Luca Lombardo

摘要

Objective

To evaluate the in vivo accuracy of guided palatal miniscrew insertion, focusing on the effect of insertion side, frontal insertion angle, and miniscrew length.

Materials and methods

In all, 52 palatal miniscrews were inserted using computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) surgical guides in 20 patients (average age: 19.74 years ± 6.83). Digital models were acquired after miniscrew insertion and scanbody application. Then, linear and angular discrepancies between planned and realized miniscrew positions were evaluated by superimposing the reference model with the final postinsertion model. Discrepancies are recorded and compared to absolute precision (hypothetical). The effect of side, frontal insertion angle, and miniscrew length on accuracy were investigated.

Results

Mean linear total discrepancies were 1.10 ± 1.01 mm and 1.71 ± 1.10 mm at the miniscrew head and tip points, respectively. Mean angular discrepancies were 5.90 ± 6.06° in the transverse (XY), 2.65 ± 2.47° in the sagittal (YZ), and 3.02 ± 2.65° in the coronal (XZ) plane. All discrepancies were significantly different to absolute precision (p < 0.001), although not to an extent considered clinically relevant. Neither side nor frontal insertion angle (clinical factors), or miniscrew length (structural factor) significantly impacted accuracy.

Conclusion

CAD/CAM surgical guides ensured clinically acceptable accuracy despite significant deviations from absolute precision. The insertion side, frontal insertion angle, and miniscrew length had minimal influence on accuracy, and therefore on outcome. Further studies should explore the effects of additional clinical, procedural, anatomical, and structural variables.