Scholarlink

<p>Ants use individual decision-making criteria that allow for choice among different foraging strategies according to prey characteristics. Some ant species do not vary their foraging strategy despite the probable ability to discriminate among prey size. Here our aim was to examine whether ants that forage individually, discriminate prey size, weight, and volume. We conducted laboratory experiments with <i>Dinoponera quadriceps</i> (Kempf 1971) workers in which we manipulated food items to observe differentiation in the ants among these parameters. <i>D. quadriceps</i> foragers discriminated food on the basis of size and weight, preferring smaller, lighter items. A 50% increase in item weight significantly reduced collection frequency, indicating that weight is a critical discriminant factor. In contrast, a twofold increase in item volume, while maintaining constant weight, had no significant effect on the foraging rate. The preference for light loads and the fragmentation of big prey suggest an optimization to maximize the number of successful foraging trips per unit of time, rather than maximizing payload per trip, which is consistent with a solitary foraging strategy.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

The influence of prey weight and size on prey selection by the individually foraging ant Dinoponera quadriceps

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年5月13日

查看全文
  • D. L. O. Azevedo,
  • I. Eloi,
  • A. Araújo

摘要

Ants use individual decision-making criteria that allow for choice among different foraging strategies according to prey characteristics. Some ant species do not vary their foraging strategy despite the probable ability to discriminate among prey size. Here our aim was to examine whether ants that forage individually, discriminate prey size, weight, and volume. We conducted laboratory experiments with Dinoponera quadriceps (Kempf 1971) workers in which we manipulated food items to observe differentiation in the ants among these parameters. D. quadriceps foragers discriminated food on the basis of size and weight, preferring smaller, lighter items. A 50% increase in item weight significantly reduced collection frequency, indicating that weight is a critical discriminant factor. In contrast, a twofold increase in item volume, while maintaining constant weight, had no significant effect on the foraging rate. The preference for light loads and the fragmentation of big prey suggest an optimization to maximize the number of successful foraging trips per unit of time, rather than maximizing payload per trip, which is consistent with a solitary foraging strategy.