<p>Following the classical approach of Birkhoff, we suggest an enriched version of <i>universal algebra</i>. Given a suitable base of enrichment <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathcal {V}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="script">V</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, we define a <i>language</i> <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathbb L\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">L</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> to be a collection of (<i>X</i>,&#xa0;<i>Y</i>)-ary function symbols whose <i>arities</i> are taken among the objects of <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathcal {V}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="script">V</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. The class of <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathbb L\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">L</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation><i>-terms</i> is constructed recursively from the symbols of <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathbb L\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">L</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, the morphisms in <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathcal {V}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="script">V</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, and by incorporating the monoidal structure of <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathcal {V}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="script">V</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. Then, <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathbb L\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">L</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation><i>-structures</i> and interpretations of terms are defined, leading to <i>enriched equational theories</i>. In this framework we characterize algebras for finitary monads on <InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathcal {V}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="script">V</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> as models of enriched equational theories.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Towards enriched universal algebra

  • J. Rosický,
  • G. Tendas

摘要

Following the classical approach of Birkhoff, we suggest an enriched version of universal algebra. Given a suitable base of enrichment \(\mathcal {V}\) V , we define a language \(\mathbb L\) L to be a collection of (XY)-ary function symbols whose arities are taken among the objects of \(\mathcal {V}\) V . The class of \(\mathbb L\) L -terms is constructed recursively from the symbols of \(\mathbb L\) L , the morphisms in \(\mathcal {V}\) V , and by incorporating the monoidal structure of \(\mathcal {V}\) V . Then, \(\mathbb L\) L -structures and interpretations of terms are defined, leading to enriched equational theories. In this framework we characterize algebras for finitary monads on \(\mathcal {V}\) V as models of enriched equational theories.