<p>We present two results related to an edge isoperimetric question for Cayley graphs on the integer lattice asked by Barber and Erde (Discrete Anal Paper no. 7:16, 2018). For any (undirected) graph <i>G</i>, the edge boundary of a subset of vertices <i>S</i> is the number of edges between <i>S</i> and its complement in <i>G</i>. Barber and Erde asked whether for any Cayley graph on <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathbb {Z}^d\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">Z</mi> </mrow> <mi>d</mi> </msup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, there is always an ordering of <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathbb {Z}^d\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">Z</mi> </mrow> <mi>d</mi> </msup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> such that for each <i>n</i>, the first <i>n</i> terms minimize the edge boundary among all subsets of size <i>n</i>. First, we present an example of a Cayley graph <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(G_d\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>G</mi> <mi>d</mi> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> on <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathbb {Z}^d\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">Z</mi> </mrow> <mi>d</mi> </msup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> (for all <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(d\ge 2\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>d</mi> <mo>≥</mo> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>) for which there is no such ordering. Furthermore, we show that for all <i>n</i> and any optimal <i>n</i>-vertex subset <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(S_n\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>S</mi> <mi>n</mi> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> of <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(G_d\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>G</mi> <mi>d</mi> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, there is no infinite sequence <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(S_n\subset S_{n+1}\subset S_{n+2}\subset \cdots \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mi>S</mi> <mi>n</mi> </msub> <mo>⊂</mo> <msub> <mi>S</mi> <mrow> <mi>n</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </msub> <mo>⊂</mo> <msub> <mi>S</mi> <mrow> <mi>n</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </msub> <mo>⊂</mo> <mo>⋯</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> of optimal sets <InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(S_i\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>S</mi> <mi>i</mi> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, where <InlineEquation ID="IEq10"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(|S_i|=i\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">|</mo> </mrow> <msub> <mi>S</mi> <mi>i</mi> </msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">|</mo> <mo>=</mo> <mi>i</mi> </mrow> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> for <InlineEquation ID="IEq11"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(i\ge n\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>i</mi> <mo>≥</mo> <mi>n</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. This is to be contrasted with the positive result in <InlineEquation ID="IEq12"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathbb {Z}^1\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">Z</mi> </mrow> <mn>1</mn> </msup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> shown by Joseph Briggs and Chris Wells [arXiv:2402.14087]. Our second result is a positive example for the unit-length triangular lattice (which is isomorphic to <InlineEquation ID="IEq13"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathbb {Z}^2\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">Z</mi> </mrow> <mn>2</mn> </msup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>) where two vertices are connected by an edge if their distance is 1 or <InlineEquation ID="IEq14"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\sqrt{3}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msqrt> <mn>3</mn> </msqrt> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. We show that this graph has such an ordering. This is the most complicated example known to us of a two-dimensional Cayley graph for which an ordering exists.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Edge Isoperimetry of Lattices

  • Cameron Strachan,
  • Konrad Swanepoel

摘要

We present two results related to an edge isoperimetric question for Cayley graphs on the integer lattice asked by Barber and Erde (Discrete Anal Paper no. 7:16, 2018). For any (undirected) graph G, the edge boundary of a subset of vertices S is the number of edges between S and its complement in G. Barber and Erde asked whether for any Cayley graph on \(\mathbb {Z}^d\) Z d , there is always an ordering of \(\mathbb {Z}^d\) Z d such that for each n, the first n terms minimize the edge boundary among all subsets of size n. First, we present an example of a Cayley graph \(G_d\) G d on \(\mathbb {Z}^d\) Z d (for all \(d\ge 2\) d 2 ) for which there is no such ordering. Furthermore, we show that for all n and any optimal n-vertex subset \(S_n\) S n of \(G_d\) G d , there is no infinite sequence \(S_n\subset S_{n+1}\subset S_{n+2}\subset \cdots \) S n S n + 1 S n + 2 of optimal sets \(S_i\) S i , where \(|S_i|=i\) | S i | = i for \(i\ge n\) i n . This is to be contrasted with the positive result in \(\mathbb {Z}^1\) Z 1 shown by Joseph Briggs and Chris Wells [arXiv:2402.14087]. Our second result is a positive example for the unit-length triangular lattice (which is isomorphic to \(\mathbb {Z}^2\) Z 2 ) where two vertices are connected by an edge if their distance is 1 or \(\sqrt{3}\) 3 . We show that this graph has such an ordering. This is the most complicated example known to us of a two-dimensional Cayley graph for which an ordering exists.