<p>When generalizing West’s stack-sorting map from permutations to words, a natural question is whether identical characters should be allowed to sit on top of each other in the stack. As a result, Defant and Kravitz introduced two distinct maps, <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textsf {tortoise} \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="sans-serif">tortoise</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textsf {hare} \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="sans-serif">hare</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>: while <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textsf {tortoise} \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="sans-serif">tortoise</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> does not allow identical characters to sit on top of themselves, <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textsf {hare} \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="sans-serif">hare</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> does. For a word <i>w</i>, let <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\langle w\rangle _{\textsf {tortoise} }\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">⟨</mo> <mi>w</mi> <mo stretchy="false">⟩</mo> </mrow> <mi mathvariant="sans-serif">tortoise</mi> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\langle w\rangle _{\textsf {hare} }\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">⟨</mo> <mi>w</mi> <mo stretchy="false">⟩</mo> </mrow> <mi mathvariant="sans-serif">hare</mi> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> be the number of iterations of <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textsf {tortoise} \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="sans-serif">tortoise</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textsf {hare} \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="sans-serif">hare</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> required to sort <i>w</i>, respectively. For a word of length <InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\left| w \right| \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mfenced close="|" open="|"> <mi>w</mi> </mfenced> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, Defant and Kravitz conjectured <Equation ID="Equ1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\begin{aligned} \langle w\rangle _{\textsf {hare} } - \langle w\rangle _{\textsf {tortoise} } \le \frac{\left| w \right| - 5}{2} \quad \text {and} \quad \langle w\rangle _{\textsf {hare} } \le 2\langle w\rangle _{\textsf {tortoise} } - 2. \end{aligned}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math display="block"> <mrow> <mtable> <mtr> <mtd columnalign="right"> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">⟨</mo> <mi>w</mi> <mo stretchy="false">⟩</mo> </mrow> <mi mathvariant="sans-serif">hare</mi> </msub> <mo>-</mo> <msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">⟨</mo> <mi>w</mi> <mo stretchy="false">⟩</mo> </mrow> <mi mathvariant="sans-serif">tortoise</mi> </msub> <mo>≤</mo> <mfrac> <mrow> <mfenced close="|" open="|"> <mi>w</mi> </mfenced> <mo>-</mo> <mn>5</mn> </mrow> <mn>2</mn> </mfrac> <mspace width="1em" /> <mtext>and</mtext> <mspace width="1em" /> <msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">⟨</mo> <mi>w</mi> <mo stretchy="false">⟩</mo> </mrow> <mi mathvariant="sans-serif">hare</mi> </msub> <mo>≤</mo> <mn>2</mn> <msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">⟨</mo> <mi>w</mi> <mo stretchy="false">⟩</mo> </mrow> <mi mathvariant="sans-serif">tortoise</mi> </msub> <mo>-</mo> <mn>2</mn> <mo>.</mo> </mrow> </mtd> </mtr> </mtable> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </Equation>We disprove both conjectures, and our results imply <InlineEquation ID="IEq10"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\langle w\rangle _{\textsf {hare} }/\langle w\rangle _{\textsf {tortoise} }\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">⟨</mo> <mi>w</mi> <mo stretchy="false">⟩</mo> </mrow> <mi mathvariant="sans-serif">hare</mi> </msub> <mo stretchy="false">/</mo> <msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">⟨</mo> <mi>w</mi> <mo stretchy="false">⟩</mo> </mrow> <mi mathvariant="sans-serif">tortoise</mi> </msub> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> may be arbitrarily large.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

A Disproof of Two Conjectures on Stack-Sorting Maps for Words

  • Olivia Chen,
  • Michael Luo,
  • Jerry Zhang

摘要

When generalizing West’s stack-sorting map from permutations to words, a natural question is whether identical characters should be allowed to sit on top of each other in the stack. As a result, Defant and Kravitz introduced two distinct maps, \(\textsf {tortoise} \) tortoise and \(\textsf {hare} \) hare : while \(\textsf {tortoise} \) tortoise does not allow identical characters to sit on top of themselves, \(\textsf {hare} \) hare does. For a word w, let \(\langle w\rangle _{\textsf {tortoise} }\) w tortoise and \(\langle w\rangle _{\textsf {hare} }\) w hare be the number of iterations of \(\textsf {tortoise} \) tortoise and \(\textsf {hare} \) hare required to sort w, respectively. For a word of length \(\left| w \right| \) w , Defant and Kravitz conjectured \(\begin{aligned} \langle w\rangle _{\textsf {hare} } - \langle w\rangle _{\textsf {tortoise} } \le \frac{\left| w \right| - 5}{2} \quad \text {and} \quad \langle w\rangle _{\textsf {hare} } \le 2\langle w\rangle _{\textsf {tortoise} } - 2. \end{aligned}\) w hare - w tortoise w - 5 2 and w hare 2 w tortoise - 2 . We disprove both conjectures, and our results imply \(\langle w\rangle _{\textsf {hare} }/\langle w\rangle _{\textsf {tortoise} }\) w hare / w tortoise may be arbitrarily large.