<p>Thompson proved that every finite group admitting a fixed-point-free automorphism of prime order is nilpotent, and Kegel showed that the same conclusion holds for finite groups admitting a splitting automorphism of prime order. Motivated by these results, Sozutov asked whether a <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(p'\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msup> <mi>p</mi> <mo>′</mo> </msup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>-group admitting a splitting automorphism of prime order is locally nilpotent if <Equation ID="Equ1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\( \langle g, g^\varphi , \dots , g^{\varphi ^{p-1}} \rangle \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math display="block"> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">⟨</mo> <mi>g</mi> <mo>,</mo> <msup> <mi>g</mi> <mi>φ</mi> </msup> <mo>,</mo> <mo>⋯</mo> <mo>,</mo> <msup> <mi>g</mi> <msup> <mi>φ</mi> <mrow> <mi>p</mi> <mo>-</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </msup> </msup> <mo stretchy="false">⟩</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </Equation>is nilpotent for every <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(g \in G\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>g</mi> <mo>∈</mo> <mi>G</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> [<CitationRef CitationID="CR7">7</CitationRef>, Problem 10.59]. We prove that if <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(G\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>G</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> is a periodic residually finite <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(p'\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msup> <mi>p</mi> <mo>′</mo> </msup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>-group admitting a splitting automorphism of prime order <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(p,\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>p</mi> <mo>,</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> then <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(G\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>G</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> is nilpotent of class bounded in terms of <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(p\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>p</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. This gives an affirmative answer, for residually finite groups, to the problem of Sozutov. We also prove that a possible counterexample to Sozutov’s problem cannot be a Tarski monster.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

A residually finite analogue of Kegel’s theorem on splitting automorphisms

  • Alfonso di Bartolo,
  • Kıvanç Ersoy,
  • Giovanni Falcone

摘要

Thompson proved that every finite group admitting a fixed-point-free automorphism of prime order is nilpotent, and Kegel showed that the same conclusion holds for finite groups admitting a splitting automorphism of prime order. Motivated by these results, Sozutov asked whether a \(p'\) p -group admitting a splitting automorphism of prime order is locally nilpotent if \( \langle g, g^\varphi , \dots , g^{\varphi ^{p-1}} \rangle \) g , g φ , , g φ p - 1 is nilpotent for every \(g \in G\) g G [7, Problem 10.59]. We prove that if \(G\) G is a periodic residually finite \(p'\) p -group admitting a splitting automorphism of prime order \(p,\) p , then \(G\) G is nilpotent of class bounded in terms of \(p\) p . This gives an affirmative answer, for residually finite groups, to the problem of Sozutov. We also prove that a possible counterexample to Sozutov’s problem cannot be a Tarski monster.