<p>We show that <i>D</i> → <i>Pη</i>′ decay amplitudes, where <i>P</i> = <i>K</i>, <i>π</i>, <i>η</i>, cannot be simply related to their <i>D</i> → <i>Pη</i> counterparts with a single <i>η</i><sub>0</sub>–<i>η</i><sub>8</sub> mixing angle. We propose a novel, consistent treatment of <i>η</i><sub>0</sub>–<i>η</i><sub>8</sub> mixing for application in <i>D</i> → <i>Pη</i> and <i>D</i> → <i>Pη</i>′ decays. Using this framework, we perform a global analysis of <i>D</i> → <i>Pη</i>′ decays employing SU(3)<sub><i>F</i></sub> symmetry including linear SU(3)<sub><i>F</i></sub> breaking. We find that the assumption of 30% SU(3)<sub><i>F</i></sub> breaking is in slight tension (2.5<i>σ</i>) with the data when compared to a fit that allows for 50% SU(3)<sub><i>F</i></sub> breaking, the latter giving a perfect description of the data. In order to allow for further scrutinization of SU(3)<sub><i>F</i></sub>-breaking effects in the future, we give branching ratio predictions for all <i>D</i> → <i>Pη</i>′ modes. Our predictions deviate from the current data in case of the branching ratios <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="13130_2025_26223_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="16" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math display="inline"> <mi mathvariant="script">B</mi> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\( \mathcal{B} \)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>(<InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="13130_2025_26223_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="25" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math display="inline"> <msubsup> <mi>D</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mo>+</mo> </msubsup> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\( {D}_s^{+} \)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> → <i>K</i><sup>+</sup><i>η</i>′) and <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="13130_2025_26223_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="16" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math display="inline"> <mi mathvariant="script">B</mi> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\( \mathcal{B} \)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>(<i>D</i><sup>+</sup> → <i>K</i><sup>+</sup><i>η</i>′). Future more precise measurements of these channels are therefore highly important in order to clarify the quality of the SU(3)<sub><i>F</i></sub> expansion in nonleptonic <i>D</i> → <i>Pη</i>′ decays.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Anatomy of non-leptonic two-body decays of charmed mesons into final states with η

  • Carolina Bolognani,
  • Ulrich Nierste,
  • Stefan Schacht,
  • K. Keri Vos

摘要

We show that D′ decay amplitudes, where P = K, π, η, cannot be simply related to their D counterparts with a single η0η8 mixing angle. We propose a novel, consistent treatment of η0η8 mixing for application in D and D′ decays. Using this framework, we perform a global analysis of D′ decays employing SU(3)F symmetry including linear SU(3)F breaking. We find that the assumption of 30% SU(3)F breaking is in slight tension (2.5σ) with the data when compared to a fit that allows for 50% SU(3)F breaking, the latter giving a perfect description of the data. In order to allow for further scrutinization of SU(3)F-breaking effects in the future, we give branching ratio predictions for all D′ modes. Our predictions deviate from the current data in case of the branching ratios B \( \mathcal{B} \) ( D s + \( {D}_s^{+} \) K+η′) and B \( \mathcal{B} \) (D+K+η′). Future more precise measurements of these channels are therefore highly important in order to clarify the quality of the SU(3)F expansion in nonleptonic D′ decays.