<p>We embed the multi-fractional instantons of SU(<i>N</i>) gauge theories on <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="13130_2025_25905_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="20" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math display="inline"> <msup> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">T</mi> <mn>4</mn> </msup> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\( {\mathbbm{T}}^4 \)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> with ’t Hooft twisted boundary conditions into U(<i>N</i>) bundles and use the Nahm transform to study the corresponding configurations on the dual <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="13130_2025_25905_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="20" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math display="inline"> <msup> <mover accent="true"> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">T</mi> <mo stretchy="true">̂</mo> </mover> <mn>4</mn> </msup> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\( {\hat{\mathbbm{T}}}^4 \)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. We first show that SU(<i>N</i>) fractional instantons of topological charge <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="13130_2025_25905_Article_IEq3.gif" Format="GIF" Height="21" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="213" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math display="inline"> <mi>Q</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mfrac> <mi>r</mi> <mi>N</mi> </mfrac> <mo>,</mo> <mi>r</mi> <mo>∈</mo> <mfenced close="}" open="{" separators=",,,"> <mn>1</mn> <mn>2</mn> <mo>…</mo> <mrow> <mi>N</mi> <mo>−</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </mfenced> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\( Q=\frac{r}{N},r\in \left\{1,2,\dots, N-1\right\} \)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, are mapped to fractional instantons of SU(<InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="13130_2025_25905_Article_IEq4.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="18" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math display="inline"> <mover accent="true"> <mi>N</mi> <mo stretchy="true">̂</mo> </mover> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\( \hat{N} \)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>) of charge <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="13130_2025_25905_Article_IEq5.gif" Format="GIF" Height="26" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="51" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math display="inline"> <mover accent="true"> <mi>Q</mi> <mo stretchy="true">̂</mo> </mover> <mo>=</mo> <mfrac> <mi>r</mi> <mover accent="true"> <mi>N</mi> <mo stretchy="true">̂</mo> </mover> </mfrac> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\( \hat{Q}=\frac{r}{\hat{N}} \)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, where <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="13130_2025_25905_Article_IEq6.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="18" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math display="inline"> <mover accent="true"> <mi>N</mi> <mo stretchy="true">̂</mo> </mover> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\( \hat{N} \)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> = <i>Nq</i><sub>1</sub><i>q</i><sub>3</sub> <i>− rq</i><sub>3</sub> + <i>q</i><sub>1</sub> and <i>q</i><sub>1<i>,</i>3</sub> are integer-quantized U(1) fluxes. We then explicitly construct the Nahm transform of constant field strength fractional instantons of SU(<i>N</i>) and find the SU(<InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="13130_2025_25905_Article_IEq7.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="18" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math display="inline"> <mover accent="true"> <mi>N</mi> <mo stretchy="true">̂</mo> </mover> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\( \hat{N} \)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>) configurations they map to. Both the <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="13130_2025_25905_Article_IEq8.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="20" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math display="inline"> <msup> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">T</mi> <mn>4</mn> </msup> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\( {\mathbbm{T}}^4 \)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> instantons and their <InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="13130_2025_25905_Article_IEq9.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="20" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math display="inline"> <msup> <mover accent="true"> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">T</mi> <mo stretchy="true">̂</mo> </mover> <mn>4</mn> </msup> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\( {\hat{\mathbbm{T}}}^4 \)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> images are self-dual for appropriately tuned torus periods. The Nahm duality can be extended to tori with detuned periods, with detuning parameter ∆, mapping solutions with ∆ &gt; 0 on <InlineEquation ID="IEq10"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="13130_2025_25905_Article_IEq10.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="20" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math display="inline"> <msup> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">T</mi> <mn>4</mn> </msup> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\( {\mathbbm{T}}^4 \)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> to ones with <InlineEquation ID="IEq11"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="13130_2025_25905_Article_IEq11.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="15" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math display="inline"> <mover accent="true"> <mtext>∆</mtext> <mo stretchy="true">̂</mo> </mover> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\( \hat{\Delta } \)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> &lt; 0 on <InlineEquation ID="IEq12"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="13130_2025_25905_Article_IEq12.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="20" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math display="inline"> <msup> <mover accent="true"> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">T</mi> <mo stretchy="true">̂</mo> </mover> <mn>4</mn> </msup> </math></EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\( {\hat{\mathbbm{T}}}^4 \)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. We also recall that fractional instantons appear in string theory precisely via the U(<i>N</i>) embedding, suggesting that studying the end point of tachyon condensation for ∆ ≠ 0 is needed — and is perhaps feasible in a small-∆ expansion, as in field theory studies — in order to understand the appearance and role of fractional instantons in <i>D</i>-brane constructions.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

The Nahm transform of multi-fractional instantons

  • Mohamed M. Anber,
  • Erich Poppitz

摘要

We embed the multi-fractional instantons of SU(N) gauge theories on T 4 \( {\mathbbm{T}}^4 \) with ’t Hooft twisted boundary conditions into U(N) bundles and use the Nahm transform to study the corresponding configurations on the dual T ̂ 4 \( {\hat{\mathbbm{T}}}^4 \) . We first show that SU(N) fractional instantons of topological charge Q = r N , r 1 2 N 1 \( Q=\frac{r}{N},r\in \left\{1,2,\dots, N-1\right\} \) , are mapped to fractional instantons of SU( N ̂ \( \hat{N} \) ) of charge Q ̂ = r N ̂ \( \hat{Q}=\frac{r}{\hat{N}} \) , where N ̂ \( \hat{N} \) = Nq1q3 − rq3 + q1 and q1,3 are integer-quantized U(1) fluxes. We then explicitly construct the Nahm transform of constant field strength fractional instantons of SU(N) and find the SU( N ̂ \( \hat{N} \) ) configurations they map to. Both the T 4 \( {\mathbbm{T}}^4 \) instantons and their T ̂ 4 \( {\hat{\mathbbm{T}}}^4 \) images are self-dual for appropriately tuned torus periods. The Nahm duality can be extended to tori with detuned periods, with detuning parameter ∆, mapping solutions with ∆ > 0 on T 4 \( {\mathbbm{T}}^4 \) to ones with ̂ \( \hat{\Delta } \) < 0 on T ̂ 4 \( {\hat{\mathbbm{T}}}^4 \) . We also recall that fractional instantons appear in string theory precisely via the U(N) embedding, suggesting that studying the end point of tachyon condensation for ∆ ≠ 0 is needed — and is perhaps feasible in a small-∆ expansion, as in field theory studies — in order to understand the appearance and role of fractional instantons in D-brane constructions.