<p>For a fermionic quantum field theory in <i>d</i> = 1 + 1 dimensions, there is a subtle difference between summing over spin structures and gauging (– 1)<sup><i>F</i></sup>. If the gravitational anomaly vanishes mod 16, then both operations are equivalent and yield a bosonic theory. But if the gravitational anomaly only vanishes mod 8, then only gauging (– 1)<sup><i>F</i></sup> is allowed, and the result is a fermionic theory. Our goal is to understand in detail how this happens, despite the fact (– 1)<sup><i>F</i></sup> is defined in terms of shifting the spin structure, which would naïvely suggest that both operations are equivalent. We do this from three perspectives: an abstract view in terms of anomalies, explicit CFT calculations, and a Symmetry TFT perspective. To conclude, we illustrate our results using the heterotic string and the famous self-triality of 8 Majorana-Weyl fermions.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Backfiring bosonisation

  • Philip Boyle Smith,
  • Yunqin Zheng

摘要

For a fermionic quantum field theory in d = 1 + 1 dimensions, there is a subtle difference between summing over spin structures and gauging (– 1)F. If the gravitational anomaly vanishes mod 16, then both operations are equivalent and yield a bosonic theory. But if the gravitational anomaly only vanishes mod 8, then only gauging (– 1)F is allowed, and the result is a fermionic theory. Our goal is to understand in detail how this happens, despite the fact (– 1)F is defined in terms of shifting the spin structure, which would naïvely suggest that both operations are equivalent. We do this from three perspectives: an abstract view in terms of anomalies, explicit CFT calculations, and a Symmetry TFT perspective. To conclude, we illustrate our results using the heterotic string and the famous self-triality of 8 Majorana-Weyl fermions.