<p>Recently, [<CitationRef CitationID="CR1">1</CitationRef>] demonstrated the 2-split for form factor under specific kinematic constraints. This factorization is analogous to that observed in scattering amplitudes. A key consequence of this structure is the presence of hidden zeros, where the form factors vanish on specific kinematic loci. We first establish these zeros and a new zero for the form factors of the composite operators <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathcal{O}=\frac{1}{2}{\text{Tr}}\left({\left(\partial \phi \right)}^{2}\right)+Tr\left({\phi }^{3}\right)\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathcal{O}={\text{Tr}}\left({F}^{2}\right)\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, and then employ an inductive proof based on the BCFW recursion relation to prove the 2-split factorization for any number of external particles.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

2-split of form factors via BCFW recursion relation

  • Liang Zhang

摘要

Recently, [1] demonstrated the 2-split for form factor under specific kinematic constraints. This factorization is analogous to that observed in scattering amplitudes. A key consequence of this structure is the presence of hidden zeros, where the form factors vanish on specific kinematic loci. We first establish these zeros and a new zero for the form factors of the composite operators \(\mathcal{O}=\frac{1}{2}{\text{Tr}}\left({\left(\partial \phi \right)}^{2}\right)+Tr\left({\phi }^{3}\right)\) and \(\mathcal{O}={\text{Tr}}\left({F}^{2}\right)\) , and then employ an inductive proof based on the BCFW recursion relation to prove the 2-split factorization for any number of external particles.